Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 784 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 825NOMINAL INDEXBaba Global Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 29 & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 784TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR v. JOHN DOE AND 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 785UMESH VERMA v. STATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 786Kroll Information Assurance LLC v. The Controller General Of Patents, Designs And Trademarks And Ors...
Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 784 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 825
NOMINAL INDEX
Baba Global Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 29 & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 784
TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR v. JOHN DOE AND 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 785
UMESH VERMA v. STATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 786
Kroll Information Assurance LLC v. The Controller General Of Patents, Designs And Trademarks And Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 787
PUMA SE v. HIMANSHU SHARMA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 788
TIPS FILMS LIMITED v. HTTPS//0GOMOVIES.COM.TR/ & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 789
SARVINDER SINGH & ANR v. VIPUL TANDON 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 790
M/S MJ Bizcrafts LLP Through Partner Rajender Kumar v. Central Goods And Services Tax Delhi South Commissionerate Through Its Commissioner & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 791
UNION OF INDIA versus VEDANTA LIMITED & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 792
BUDHI SINGH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 793
ARSALAN FEROZE AHENGER v. NIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 794
Reliance Industries Limited v. Pawan Kumar Gupta & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 795
Johnson & Johnson Pte Ltd v. Mr. Abbireddi Satish Kumar & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 796
ANWAR KHAN @ CHACHA & ORS v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 797
X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 798
A v. B 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 799
SAMIR @ AZHAR v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 800
DR. SUBHASH VIJAYRAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 801
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 802
Bhupender Kumar v. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Ors.2025 LiveLaw (Del) 803
ABHIJIT MISHRA v. WIPRO LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 804
Tungsten Automation England Limited (Formerly Known As Tungsten Network Limited) v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation, Circle 3(1)(1) New Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 805
Principal Commissioner Of Customs (ACC Imports) Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 806
ANIL VERMA v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 807
Exclusive Motors Pvt Ltd v. CBI & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 808
ANKIT v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 809
Reliance Retail Limited v. Ashok Kumar & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 810
MOHD ANWAR & ORS. v. STATE NCT OF DELHI and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 811
Dolby International AB & Anr. v. Lava International Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 812
Ability Dodzi @ Chinazom Ability v. State NCT Of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 813
Arpit Mishra v. State2025 LiveLaw (Del) 814
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Union Bank of India Ltd. & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 815
BALBIR MEENA v. STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 816
Neeraj Bharadwaj v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 1(1)(2) & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 818
CANARA BANK versus SANJEEV SHARMA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 819
Ms. X v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 820
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. MUKESH & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 821
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI v. JAWAHAR SINGH 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 822
Bhadra International India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Punjab national Bank & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 823
Amit Jain & Ors. v. Anila Jain & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 824
E. R. SQUIBB AND SONS, LLC & ORS v. ZYDUS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 825
Case title: Baba Global Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 29 & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 784
The Delhi High Court has held that the Assessing Officer is the “authority” to decide whether a reassessment action under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act 1961 should be initiated against an assessee and his stance can't be revised at the instance of another authority.
Delhi High Court Passes John Doe Order, Restrains Infringement Of 'Tata' Trademarks
Title: TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR v. JOHN DOE AND ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 785
The Delhi High Court has passed a john doe order restraining the infringement of “Tata” trademarks, observing that repeated instances of duping of customers had occurred through domains that have claimed to offer fake dealerships or distributorships.
Title: UMESH VERMA v. STATE
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 786
Denying bail to a man in a fraud case, the Delhi High Court has observed that cryptocurrency has profound implications on country's economy which dissolves recognized money into “dark unknown and untraceable money.”
Case title: Kroll Information Assurance LLC v. The Controller General Of Patents, Designs And Trademarks And Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 787
The Delhi High Court has declined a plea moved by US-based Kroll Information Assurance, seeking to patent 'System to locate users via a Peer to Peer Network'.
Justice Amit Bansal cited Section 3(k) of the Patents Act 1970 which declares inventions related to 'algorithm' and 'computer program per se' as non-patentable.
Title: PUMA SE v. HIMANSHU SHARMA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 788
The Delhi High Court has awarded Rs. 8 lakh in favour of footwear brand Puma in its trademark infringement suit against an individual manufacturing counterfeit products.
Delhi High Court Restrains Rogue Websites From Streaming Maalik, Sarbala Ji Movie Content
Title: TIPS FILMS LIMITED v. HTTPS//0GOMOVIES.COM.TR/ & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 789
The Delhi High Court has restrained 56 rogue websites from illegally and unauthorisedly streaming content of Maalik and Sarbala Ji movies.
Need Evidence To Ascertain Rent, Can't Do Guess Work To Calculate Mense Profit: Delhi High Court
Title: SARVINDER SINGH & ANR v. VIPUL TANDON
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 790
The Delhi High Court has held that coming to a figure which might be the rent of an area on its own, without any material, is not permissible in law.
Justice Subramonium Prasad said mere guess work in thin air is no evidence and cannot be used to ascertain rent.
Case title: M/S MJ Bizcrafts LLP Through Partner Rajender Kumar v. Central Goods And Services Tax Delhi South Commissionerate Through Its Commissioner & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 791
The Delhi High Court has observed that once an appeal is filed by the assessee under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and pre-deposit is made, there is “automatic stay” of the impugned order raising demand.
Case Title: UNION OF INDIA versus VEDANTA LIMITED & ANR.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 792
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh has held that parties cannot be prevented from performing their contractual obligations as interpreted in the Final Partial Award, especially when both the Final Partial Award as well as the contract interpreted therein have not been stayed and remain in force.
Title: BUDHI SINGH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI and other connected matters
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 793
The Delhi High Court has ruled that applications for furlough and parole of a convict can be considered by the prison authorities during the pendency of their appeals against conviction before the Supreme Court.
Using Social Media For Disseminating Radical Ideology Attracts UAPA: Delhi High Court
Title: ARSALAN FEROZE AHENGER v. NIA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 794
The Delhi High Court has observed that using social media for disseminating radical information or ideology attracts UAPA and that it is not necessary that such an act must be a physical activity.
Case title: Reliance Industries Limited v. Pawan Kumar Gupta & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 795
The Delhi High Court has ordered e-commerce platforms like Amazon and Flipkart to temporarily delist pages of as many as 21 sellers offering counterfeit products in the FMCG sector by misusing Reliance and Jio trademarks.
Case title: Johnson & Johnson Pte Ltd v. Mr. Abbireddi Satish Kumar & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 796
The Delhi High Court awarded Rs. 1,21,56,864 cumulative damages to pharmaceutical multinational Johnson & Johnson over infringement of its ORSL trademark.
ORS-L (later changed to ORSL) is a range of flavoured electrolyte drinks first introduced by Jagdale Industries Limited in 2003.
Title: ANWAR KHAN @ CHACHA & ORS v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 797
The Delhi High Court has ruled that there is no statutory or judicial bar on re-arrest of an accused after curing the procedural defects of a prior illegal arrest.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said that a lapse or omission on the part of the investigating agency, whether inadvertent or deliberate, cannot result in a blanket immunity to the accused against any future arrest in the same case.
Title: X v. Y
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 798
The Delhi High Court has observed that the Domestic Violence Act does not distinguish between a first or subsequent marriage for the purpose of entitlement to maintenance.
Self-Declared Information On Matrimonial Site Not Admissible Proof Of Income: Delhi High Court
Title: A v. B
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 799
The Delhi High Court has observed that any “self-declared information” made on a matrimonial portal, without verification or corroborative evidence, cannot be treated as reliable or admissible proof of income.
Title: SAMIR @ AZHAR v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 800
The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a man accused in a murder case while strongly deprecating the conduct of an investigating officer who appeared in Court without proper case file and diaries.
Title: DR. SUBHASH VIJAYRAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 801
The Delhi High Court directed the Union and Delhi Governments to take a decision on framing a standard operating procedure (SOP) or guidelines to avoid unnecessary references being made to the forensic science laboratories (FSLs).
Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 802
The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to take steps to make ad-hoc appointments to the post of Additional Public Prosecutors or Assistant Public Prosecutors in the criminal courts, pending regular recruitment.
Case title: Bhupender Kumar v. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 803
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that Section 122(1A) of the Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 can be imposed retrospectively, provided the show cause notice had been issued to the assessee when the provision was introduced.
Title: ABHIJIT MISHRA v. WIPRO LIMITED
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 804
The Delhi High Court has expunged defamatory remarks made against the character of an employee working with Wipro Limited from his termination letter.
Case title: Tungsten Automation England Limited (Formerly Known As Tungsten Network Limited) v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation, Circle 3(1)(1) New Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 805
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that consideration paid for merely availing services that require technical expertise would not qualify as 'Fees for Technical Service' under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA.
Case title: Principal Commissioner Of Customs (ACC Imports) Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 806
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that the Customs authority cannot, in absence of some evidence, decline refund of excess duty paid by a trader when the latter furnishes certificates from a qualified chartered accountant in support of its case.
Title: ANIL VERMA v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 807
The Delhi High Court has imposed Rs. 20,000 costs on a woman for filing a sexual assault case against her live-in partner, observing that such a complaint cannot be permitted to be filed in a casual or reckless manner.
CBI Can't Seek Demand Draft Of Suspected Proceeds Of Crime U/S 91 CrPC: Delhi High Court
Case title: Exclusive Motors Pvt Ltd v. CBI & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 808
The Delhi High Court has held that Section 91 of CrPC, which empowers the Police to seek production of 'any document or other thing' desirable for the purposes of investigation, cannot be used to seek a demand draft of the amount suspected to be proceeds of crime.
After High Court Rap, Delhi Police Assures Production Of Case Diaries By All Investigating Officers
Title: ANKIT v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 809
After Delhi High Court rap, the Delhi Police has assured the Court that henceforth all the investigating officers shall produce the case diaries of the case for judicial examination.
Case title: Reliance Retail Limited v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 810
The Delhi High Court has issued interim directions restraining infringement of Reliance Retail's Tira trademark in the beauty and personal care sector and its misuse to commit financial scams.
Case Title: MOHD ANWAR & ORS. v. STATE NCT OF DELHI and other connected matters
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 811
The Delhi High Court quashed 16 cases registered against 70 Indian nationals accused of sheltering attendees of Tablighi Jamaat congregation in their homes or mosques during COVID-19.
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna quashed the chargesheets registered against the Indian nationals and disposed of their pleas seeking quashing of 16 FIRs registered against them.
Case title: Dolby International AB & Anr. v. Lava International Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 812
The Delhi High Court had the occasion to discuss in detail the scope of a pro tem order, while dealing with Europe based audio/video processor Dolby International's suit against alleged patent infringement by Indian mobile phone company Lava.
Case title: Ability Dodzi @ Chinazom Ability v. State NCT Of Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 813
The Delhi High Court has held that the bar prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Surakhsha Sanhita 2023 against revision of interlocutory orders cannot be bypassed by invoking the High Court's inherent powers.
Case title: Arpit Mishra v. State
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 814
The Delhi High Court has observed that refusal of the prosecutrix to undergo medical examination despite alleging serious sexual assault can weaken the prosecution's case.
Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Of About ₹229.5 Crores Against NHAI As 'Termination Payment'
Case Title: National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Union Bank of India Ltd. & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 815
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh has upheld an Arbitral Award directing the National Highways Authority of India (“NHAI”/”Petitioner”) to deposit ₹229.50 crores as Termination Payment into the Escrow Account along with interest and costs. The court reiterated that the scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is narrow and circumscribed. The Arbitral Award can be set aside on the ground, inter alia, being in conflict with the public policy of India, patent illegality, violation of principles of natural justice.
Title: BALBIR MEENA v. STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 816
The Delhi High Court has imposed costs of Rs. 20,000 on a litigant for “misusing and abusing” the victim compensation scheme under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Case title: Neeraj Bharadwaj v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 1(1)(2) & Anr
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 818
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that assessments under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be made on a non-searched entity only when the Assessing Officer has incriminating material which “has a bearing” on its total income.
Case Title: CANARA BANK versus SANJEEV SHARMA & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 819
The Delhi High Court bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar held that when an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act is filed in opposition to a civil suit, a party cannot later object that the arbitration was intended to apply only to specific respondents, especially when the pleadings indicate that the agreements formed part of a single commercial transaction.
Case title: Ms. X v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 820
Stating that DNA testing is an “almost perfect science” to determine truthfulness of the allegations of rape, the Delhi High Court has held that Police is duty bound to take accused's blood sample for analysis in such cases.
Title: THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. MUKESH & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 821
The Delhi High Court has observed that confinement within a room is sufficient to make out a prima facie case for framing charge for the offence of wrongful confinement.
Mere Threats Without Intention To Cause Alarm Not Criminal Intimidation: Delhi High Court
Title: STATE OF NCT OF DELHI v. JAWAHAR SINGH
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 822
The Delhi High Court has observed that mere threats given by the accused, without an intention to cause alarm, would not constitute an offence of criminal intimidation.
Case Title: Bhadra International India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Punjab national Bank & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 823
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition while upholding that if a borrower has already approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the SARFAESI Act, for a one-time settlement, a writ seeking the same relief under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable.
Case title: Amit Jain & Ors. v. Anila Jain & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 824
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that monthly payment of rent made under a registered lease deed cannot be construed as instalments towards the sale consideration of a property.
Title: E. R. SQUIBB AND SONS, LLC & ORS v. ZYDUS LIFESCIENCES LIMITED
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 825
The Delhi High Court has restrained Zydus Lifesciences Limited from manufacturing, selling importing, exporting or dealing in any biologic which is similar to Nivolumab, a drug used to treat cancer, sold under the brand name “Opdivo.”