Sibal: May I make a point? in full fledged... ... Justice Yashwant Varma Case: Supreme Court Hearing- Live Updates

Sibal: May I make a point? in full fledged inquiry, then the removal takes place. In this inquiry, there is no such procedure

J Datta: there is no question of that in the preliminary inquiry. You could have raised this point if there was a provision for cross-examination. Your submission is that it led to recommendation?

Sibal: no, in judges inquiry, there is a procedure for removal and in the inhouse, there is no such procedure. there is anomoly.

J Datta: is Parliament bound by inhouse procedure? the CJI feels that its a case which warrants being reported based on evidence, charges are serious and removal exercise should be undertaken. On the basis of inhouse, the CJI can withdraw judicial work but for the Parliament, they may or maynot take into consideration. It is not removal that is advised. Somebody advising initiating of procedure is different. the MPs looked into the CJI recommendation? is it out in public?