SG: they wanted to present their problems CJI:... ... Supreme Court Hearing-Presidential Reference On Timelines For Bills' Assent-DAY-9 : Live Updates

SG: they wanted to present their problems

CJI: they wanted to give data of respective states on how many bills are pending for months and years. You can't then represent the data

SG: 90% bills are assented to within 1 month

J Nath: how is that relevant?

CJI: we are proud of our constitution. what is having in neighourbing states, what happened in nepal

J Nath: or Bangladesh

SG: he argued felt necessities. I am saying, earlier such issues were arising but states were not advised to rush to the court

J Nath: what is wrong if they are better advised today?

SG: I strongly object to this kind of objections by [sibal]

J Kant: the point is if one bill is withheld or 1000,

SG: that fire in the auditoriam argument that something is happening

CJI: we didn't permit them, we will not permit you

SG: he argued felt necessities, not facts.