Sibal: see the consequence- Guv says I am... ... Supreme Court Hearing-Presidential Reference On Timelines For Bills' Assent-DAY-7 : Live Updates

Sibal: see the consequence- Guv says I am withholding the Bill because I believe it is unconstitutional and State passes it again and he still withholds it.

CJI: he can't withhold in second

Sibal: but he does, then what happens? If somebody files a petition, Guv can't become a party and who will defend him? let's not make the constitution interpretion such that it becomes unworkable. That's the argument made under Article 361. The language does not matter, its objective does. It owes its genesis to history but owes its allegiance to the future. Somebody gave a timeline for 3 months, you don't give timeline but you will have to say something. When you come to deemed to, you say you don't have a solution.