Sibal: 1, 2 and 3 questions arise because they are... ... Supreme Court Hearing-Presidential Reference On Timelines For Bills' Assent-DAY-7 : Live Updates

Sibal: 1, 2 and 3 questions arise because they are specific though constitutionally, these are not in context of any facts.

Article 361-how does this arise? what is the relevance? no such thing has happened and why should you answer it?

absence of prescribed timelimit- why do you assume there is no constitutionally prescribed timelimit-there can't be an assumption made.

201 question has not arise in any situation- in a fact situation if it arises, you can answer it. It is obvious that there is a judgment of this court and someone wants to say that no, its not good. You are directly dealing with the judgment which is prohibited. It will be challenged, I am sure and this may be set aside, I have no problem. But this is no way.

anterior to the law question- has it been said by any judge? You can't trajecttually attack the judgment in a manner.

All these questions, with greatest respect, should not be answered. Only parameter which should be answered is Article 200 in the context of the Governor.