Sibal: they say, in previous act, there was... ... Waqf Amendment Act Challenge : Live Updates From Supreme Court

Sibal: they say, in previous act, there was requirement for registration and because you didn't register- will not be regarded as waqf. Many created 100, 200 and 500 years ago

CJI: is there a requirement for registration?

Sibal: it was, but there was no consequences for non registration

CJI: You will have to start from A, B, C, D. i will not read. Was the registration mandatory?

Sibal: shall was used

CJI: merely because it uses shall not be mandatory unless consequences are provided

Sibal: consequence was not the nature of waqf will change- that it will not be regarded as waqf