Nominal Index:Prof Dr. Nikhil D. Datar vs. State Of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 146High Court of Judicature at Bombay on its own Motion vs. MCGM and Anr & Access to Hope vs. Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 147SJK Buildcon LLP vs. Kusum Pandurang Keni & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 148Bholashankar Ramsuresh Dubey Versus Dinesh Narayan Tiwari and...
Nominal Index:
Prof Dr. Nikhil D. Datar vs. State Of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 146
High Court of Judicature at Bombay on its own Motion vs. MCGM and Anr & Access to Hope vs. Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 147
SJK Buildcon LLP vs. Kusum Pandurang Keni & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 148
Bholashankar Ramsuresh Dubey Versus Dinesh Narayan Tiwari and Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 149
Judgments/Final Orders:
Case Title: Prof Dr. Nikhil D. Datar vs. State Of Maharashtra
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 146
The Bombay High Court has disposed of a PIL that sought directions to ensure compliance with a Supreme Court order regarding a mechanism for enforcing 'living wills', taking into account the State government's submission that it has taken steps to comply with the Apex Court's directions. The PIL sought the proper implementation of the Supreme Court's directives on passive euthanasia in Common Cause v. Union of India (2023 LiveLaw (SC) 79).
Case title: High Court of Judicature at Bombay on its own Motion vs. MCGM and Anr & Access to Hope vs. Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 147
The Bombay High Court on Thursday (April 17) asked has directed the State Advisory Board On Disability to expeditiously consider the grievances of differently abled people with respect to accessibility at bus stops. The PIL sought the implementation of the 'Harmonised Guidelines and Space Standards for Barrier Free Built Environment, 2021' concerning bus stops and terminals in Mumbai.
Case Title: SJK Buildcon LLP vs. Kusum Pandurang Keni & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 148
The Bombay High Court bench of Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan has held that the jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) cannot be invoked to circumvent the statutory protection afforded to tenants under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (“Rent Act”). Interim measures under Section 9 must aid arbitral proceedings and cannot override or conflict with special statutory mechanisms under the Rent Act for eviction and redevelopment.
Case Title: Bholashankar Ramsuresh Dubey Versus Dinesh Narayan Tiwari and Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 149
The Bombay High Court bench of Justice N. J. Jamadar has held that the dispute cannot be refused referral to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) based solely on mere allegations of fraud simpliciter, unless serious allegations of fraud that go to the root of the partnership deed containing the arbitration clause are established.
Other Orders/Observations:
The Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) on Tuesday offered an "unconditional apology" to the Bombay High Court for defying the orders of the Supreme Court in Re: Directions in the matter of Demolition of Structures, and demolishing the alleged illegal portions of the houses of the accused in the recent communal violence case. The NMC filed its affidavit before a division bench led by Justice Nitin Sambre, stating that it was unaware of the Supreme Court's ruling as neither the Maharashtra government nor the Nagpur civic body has issued the mandatory guidelines as directed by the Supreme Court.
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday (April 16) granted interim protection from arrest to comedian Kunal Kamra in his plea for quashing an FIR lodged against him following his satirical video and "gaddar" comment purportedly made against Maharashtra's Deputy CM Eknath Shinde.