Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 509 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 534NOMINAL INDEXDEEPA JOSEPH & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 509 Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited v. Uber India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 510 LALIT SHARMA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 511 Varun Jindal v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 512 Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. Union...
Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 509 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 534
NOMINAL INDEX
DEEPA JOSEPH & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 509
Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited v. Uber India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 510
LALIT SHARMA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 511
Varun Jindal v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 512
Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 513
Abhin Narula v. The High Court Of Delhi Through Registrar General & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 514
SC Gupta v. Union of India & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 515
A R Rahman v. Ustad Faiyaz Wasifuddin Dagar & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 516
Rajiv Sarin & Ors. v. Directorate Of Estates & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 517
SAISHA CHHILLAR MINOR REPRESENTED THROUGH HER MOTHER MS. JYOTI CHHILLAR v. THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 518
SUDHANSHU PATHAK v. CONSORTIUM OF NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITIES THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 519
Gurudas Mallik Thakur v. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 520
Shristi Infrastructure Development vs Scorpio Engineering Private Limited and Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 521
Maharani Bagh Co-Operative House Building And Welfare Society Ltd., & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 522
TV Today v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 523
Coomi Kapoor v. Netflix Entertainment Services India LLP & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 524
LALIT SHARMA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 525
Ms. X v. State Of Nct Of Delhi And Others 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 526
Dilshad Hussain v. Pushpa Devi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 527
SMAS Auto Leasing India Private Limited v. Gensol Engineering Limited & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 528
BHAVREEN KANDHARI v. SHRI C. D. SINGH AND ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 529
Hamdard National Foundation India v. Patanjali Food Limited & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 530
Sandeep Garg v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 66 Zone 4 Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 531
Gurmeet Singh Sachdeva v. Skyways Air Services Pvt. Ltd 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 532
Neeraj Gupta & Anr. v. MCD & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 533
NEERAJ GUPTA v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 534
Take Expeditious Steps To Enact Advocates Protection Bill: High Court To Delhi Government
Title: DEEPA JOSEPH & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 509
The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Government to take expeditious steps for enacting the Advocates Protection Bill, 2024.
Justice Sachin Datta directed the Delhi Government to file a fresh status report in a plea claiming that there was an "alarming rise" in incidents of violence inside the court premises of different district courts in Delhi.
Title: Royal Challengers Sports Private Limited v. Uber India & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 510
The Delhi High Court dismissed the interim injunction plea filed by IPL team Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) in its suit against Uber Moto over allegedly disparaging YouTube advertisement featuring Sunrisers Hyderabad's cricketer Travis Head.
Justice Saurabh Banerjee rejected the interim injunction application filed by RCB, observing that the impugned advertisement does not call for any interference at this stage.
Title: LALIT SHARMA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 511
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Police to take strict action against anyone, either lawyer or non-lawyer, who causes obstruction or disturbance in the conduct of Shahdara Bar Association elections which are scheduled to be held on May 09.
The order was passed by a full bench comprising Justice Prathiba M Singh, Justice Navin Chawla and Justice C Hari Shankar.
Case title: Varun Jindal v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 512
The Delhi High Court has asked the Railway Department to pay ₹8 lakh as compensation to a man who sustained grievous injuries that resulted in amputation of his left leg back in the year 2015, after falling from a moving train.
The incident was a result of a heavy jerk on the train due to which the Appellant lost his balance and fell out of the allegedly overcrowded general compartment.
Case title: Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 513
The Delhi High Court has refused relief to an aspiring CRPF Sub-Inspector (Staff Nurse) who was denied marks as he failed to mention requisite work-experience mandatorily required in the application for recruitment.
Though the Petitioner had worked as Male Nurse Staff at a private hospital for more than five years, he was awarded 0 out of 5 marks earmarked in the selection criteria for prior experience.
Case title: Abhin Narula v. The High Court Of Delhi Through Registrar General & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 514
In a peculiar order, the Delhi High Court found force in a challenge to the 2023 Delhi Judicial Service Exam answer key but did not grant any relief to the aggrieved aspirant, citing a coordinate bench decision denying relief in a similar case.
A division bench of Justices C. Hari Shankar and Justice Ajay Digpaul said it had to exercise 'judicial discipline'
Case title: SC Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 515
The Delhi High Court has held that though the provisions of CPC contained in Order II Rule 2 and Section 11 (pertaining to principle of Res Judicata) may not be strictly applicable to writ proceedings, however, the broad principles enshrined therein including the principle of Constructive Res Judicata will have application even to writ proceedings.
Title: A R Rahman v. Ustad Faiyaz Wasifuddin Dagar & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 516
The Delhi High Court stayed an interim injunction order granted in favour of veteran Indian classical singer Ustad Faiyaz Wasifuddin Dagar in his suit alleging copyright infringement of his “Shiva Stuti” composition by music composer A.R. Rahman and other producers in Tamil film Ponniyan Selvan 2 song "Veera Raja Veera.”
Case title: Rajiv Sarin & Ors. v. Directorate Of Estates & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 517
The Delhi High Court has held that prolonged illegal occupation of private property by government authorities is unconstitutional and that State power cannot override property rights.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav emphasized, “Executive overreach beyond the four corners of the law must be met with constitutional censure, for when the protector of rights becomes the violator, the very fabric of the rule of law is imperiled. In a constitutional democracy governed by the principles of justice, equity, and good conscience, the preservation of legal rights such as that of proprietary must remain an unyielding commitment of the State.”
Title: SAISHA CHHILLAR MINOR REPRESENTED THROUGH HER MOTHER MS. JYOTI CHHILLAR v. THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 518
The Delhi High Court has observed that a school cannot deny transfer certificate to a child merely because the parents have ongoing matrimonial or guardianship dispute.
“…the school cannot deny the issuance of Transfer Certificate (TC) to the child who has sought admission in other school. In the event of delay in issuance of Transfer Certificate, even a disciplinary action can be taken against the Head-Master or In-Charge of the school. Needless to say that in a matrimonial or guardianship dispute, it is the interest of the child which is of paramount consideration,” Justice Vikas Mahajan said.
Case Title: SUDHANSHU PATHAK v. CONSORTIUM OF NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITIES THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 519
The Delhi High Court has directed the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to take a concrete decision so that no student giving Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) entrance examination is excluded due to language barrier.
Case title: Gurudas Mallik Thakur v. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 520
The Delhi High Court has held that the penalty for GST evasion contemplated under Section 122(1A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, can be imposed on 'any person'— whether taxable or non-taxable.
Case Title: Shristi Infrastructure Development vs Scorpio Engineering Private Limited and Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 521
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Jasmeet Singh held that an ad-hoc arbitrator (appointed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996) is empowered to grant interest rate contemplated under Section 16 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, even if the reference was not made to the MSME Facilitation Council for resolving disputes.
Case title: Maharani Bagh Co-Operative House Building And Welfare Society Ltd., & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 522
The Delhi High Court has held that individuals who erect unauthorized structures and encroach upon public land cannot be permitted to assert their purported rights in priority of other citizens.
Title: TV Today v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 523
The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition filed by TV Today, which owns Aaj Tak and India Today news channels, highlighting the misuse of deepfake.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela asked TV Today to give its suggestions to the Committee of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITy), which is examining the issue of deepfakes.
Title: Coomi Kapoor v. Netflix Entertainment Services India LLP & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 524
The Delhi High Court referred to mediation a dispute between Coomi Kapoor- senior journalist and author of the book “The Emergency: A Personal History”, Manikarnika Films and Netflix over alleged breach of contract and damaging her reputation.
Delhi High Court Postpones Conduct Of Shahdara Bar Association Elections To May 24
Title: LALIT SHARMA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 525
The Delhi High Court postponed the conduct of Shahdara Bar Association elections to May 24. The polls were scheduled to be held on May 09.
The order was passed by a full bench comprising Justice Prathiba M Singh, Justice Navin Chawla and Justice C Hari Shankar.
Case title: Ms. X v. State Of Nct Of Delhi And Others
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 526
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that if part of a cognizable offence alleged, occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of a Police station, they must register a regular FIR and probe the offence rather than registering a 'Zero FIR' and transferring the case to another police station.
Case title: Dilshad Hussain v. Pushpa Devi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 527
The Delhi High Court has elucidated the difference 'intermediate' and 'interlocutory' orders in relation to Section 379 CrPC, which bars revision of interlocutory orders.
Case Title: SMAS Auto Leasing India Private Limited v. Gensol Engineering Limited & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 528
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Jyoti Singh has granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to the the petitioner who is the owner of electric vehicles (EVs) leased under Master Lease Agreements upon apprehensions of financial distress, default in lease payments by the respondents and a risk of dissipation or deterioration of assets pending arbitration. The Court restrained the respondents from transferring or encumbering the EVs.
Title: BHAVREEN KANDHARI v. SHRI C. D. SINGH AND ORS.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 529
The Delhi High Court ruled that the permission for felling of 50 or more trees in the national capital will be supervised by the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) as per the order of the Supreme Court.
Justice Jasmeet Singh added that permission for felling of upto 50 trees shall continue till the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is implemented by the city authorities.
Delhi High Court Closes Hamdard's Suit After Ramdev Removes Videos Making 'Sharbat Jihad' Remark
Title: Hamdard National Foundation India v. Patanjali Food Limited & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 530
The Delhi High Court closed the suit filed by Hamdard National Foundation India against Yoga Guru Ramdev over his “Sharbat Jihad” remark against former's Rooh Afza product.
Justice Amit Bansal decreed the suit after Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar informed Court that affidavits have been filed by Ramdev and Patanjali Foods Limited that the impugned videos and posts have been taken down.
Case title: Sandeep Garg v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 66 Zone 4 Delhi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 531
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that an assessee cannot claim he was not granted an opportunity of hearing before an adverse order is passed, if he fails to check the GST portal for show cause notice and respond to the same.
Case title: Gurmeet Singh Sachdeva v. Skyways Air Services Pvt. Ltd
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 532
The Delhi High Court has held that the plaint filed for instituting a suit cannot be read in isolation and the documents annexed with it can be considered to determine whether the plaint discloses a 'cause of action' for proceeding in the matter.
Case title: Neeraj Gupta & Anr. v. MCD & Anr.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 533
The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with the demolition of tehbazari sites (kiosks) being carried out by the National Capital Region Transport Corporation (NCRTC) at Sarai Kale Khan, for development of a metro rail station as part of the Regional Rapid Transit System (RRTS) project.
Title: NEERAJ GUPTA v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 534
he Delhi High Court imposed Rs. 20,000 as costs after a Central Government standing counsel sought repeated adjournments in an IPR case.
Justice Saurabh Banerjee renotified the matter and granted adjournment, subject to payment of costs to be paid to the Army Central Welfare Fund by the Central Government within four weeks.