Nominal Index [Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 103 - 111]Gurprabh Singh @ Prince v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 103COMPUTER TEACHERS WELFARE SOCIETY(REGD) Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS LiveLaw (PH) 104ABCD v. State of Haryana LiveLaw (PH) 105Navneet Chauhan and others v. State of Haryana and another LiveLaw (PH) 106 ARJUN SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS LiveLaw (PH)...
Nominal Index [Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 103 - 111]
Gurprabh Singh @ Prince v. State of Punjab 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 103
COMPUTER TEACHERS WELFARE SOCIETY(REGD) Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS LiveLaw (PH) 104
ABCD v. State of Haryana LiveLaw (PH) 105
Navneet Chauhan and others v. State of Haryana and another LiveLaw (PH) 106
ARJUN SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS LiveLaw (PH) 107
Gaurav Sorot v. State of Haryana and others LiveLaw (PH) 108
Navdeep Singh and another v. State of Punjab and others LiveLaw (PH) 109
Pawan Kumar v. Inspector (Preventive), Central Goods and Services Tax LiveLaw (PH) 110
JAGMAL SINGH JATAIN v. DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA LiveLaw (PH) 111
Reports
Title: Gurprabh Singh @ Prince v. State of Punjab
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 103
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has said that the bar on granting bail in case of commercial quantity under Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be relaxed when the alleged recovered contraband is "marginally above" the commercial quantity. Section 37 of the NDPS Act states that bail should not be granted to an accused unless the accused is able to satisfy twin conditions i.e. reasonable ground for believing that the accused is not guilty of such an offence and that the accused would not commit an offence or is not likely to commit an offence, if granted bail.
Title: COMPUTER TEACHERS WELFARE SOCIETY(REGD) Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 104
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has made it clear that the computer teachers recruited under the Punjab Information and Technology Education Society (PICTES) are required to be governed by the Punjab Civil Service (PCS) Rules.
Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Vikas Suri said, "Reiteratedly since the letters of appointment have been issued in the name of the Governor of Punjab, therebys, there cannot be any subsequent thereto alteration in service conditions, as may be becomes envisaged in the Service Rules, 2024. If the said is done, it would be breaching the terms and conditions of the appointment letter, which would be grossly impermissible, as therebys the inviolable contract of employment would become breached."
Title: ABCD v. State of Haryana
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 105
"When a person has been exonerated by the Court of his guilt, the remnants of such charge should not be allowed to haunt any such person", said the Punjab & Haryana High Court while directing its Registry to redact the name of a man who was accused in a FIR, which was later quashed.
The petitioner stated that he is a respectable man and despite clearing the interviews for employment in multinational companies, he didn't receive the offer letter because his name was available on e-courts portal as an accused in a criminal case.
Title: Navneet Chauhan and others v. State of Haryana and another
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 106
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has set aside charges framed under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, observing that the offence cannot be attracted merely on the ground that the victim belongs to the SC/ST community without intention to humiliate him due to his caste.
Title: ARJUN SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 107
The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the plea challenging the screening test question paper for the post of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) (Chemistry) and its final answer key published in October 2024 noting that the expert committee has already been formed and Court cannot sit over it, unless there is an allegation of malice.
Title: Gaurav Sorot v. State of Haryana and others
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 108
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has made it clear that extension lecturer holding M.Phil degree who have not qualified UGC NET has no right to continue in service and is required to be relieved from service.
Title: Navdeep Singh and another v. State of Punjab and others
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 109
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed the plea of two judiciary candidates, whose selection was cancelled in 2002 for alleged involvement in recruitment scam, seeking appointment.
Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel cited delay on part of the candidate in approaching the Court, after they were acquitted in the corruption case in 2016.
Title: Pawan Kumar v. Inspector (Preventive), Central Goods and Services Tax
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 110
Observing that the case shows "distressing picture of the criminal justice system's failure", the Punjab & Haryana High Court has set aside condition to pay Rs.1.10 crore in bail bond for granting default bail to an accused in Tax Fraud case.
The Court noted that the accused has been in custody for the past 4 years, 01 month and 20 days, while the maximum sentence for the alleged offences is 5 years.
Title: JAGMAL SINGH JATAIN v. DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (PH) 111
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has made it clear that Bar Council Of India (BCI) cannot entertain appeal from interim order of the State Bar Council's disciplinary committee when the probe is pending and no punishment is imposed.
Other Developments
Title: XXXX v. UOI
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has directed the Union Government to decide representation for the extension of stay of a 5-year-old Pakistan-born girl who is currently staying with her mother in India. The mother got married to a Pakistani citizen in 2019 but later got divorced and returned to India. The minor girl was born in Pakistan and is, therefore, a Pakistani citizen. The girl's father was making an effort for the custody; however, the child, being young, wanted to stay with her mother in India.
Antriksh Vs. Manoj Kumar and others
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has initiated contempt proceedings and directed a police inquiry against litigants who were found to have fabricated the High Court's order to claim that they had received an interim stay on a partition proceeding.
While issuing a contempt notice, Justice Harsh Bunger said, “Apparently, the original order... passed by this Court in CWP No.31164 of 2024 has been fudged/forged and fabricated, which is indeed a serious matter and requires to be thoroughly investigated/inquired into.”
Title: Vikramjit Singh v. Election Commission of India and others
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has asked Gauhati High Court's Registrar General to facilitate the service of notice to NSA detainee MP Amritpal Singh, who is currently lodged in Dibrugarh Jail. The Court noted that as per the office report, repeated efforts to serve the respondent through the Jail Superintendent have not been successful. Justice Anil Kshetarpal said, “Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the Registrar General, Gauhati High Court is requested to facilitate the service of notice upon respondent No.4, a detenue who is lodged in Central Jail, Dibrugarh.”
Title: PEOPLE WELFARE SOCIETY v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
The Punjab & Haryana High Court today sought a response from the Punjab Government and other authorities on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed seeking the implementation of guidelines issued by the Supreme Court against bulldozer action and provisions of NDPS Act, following the reported demolition drive by the Punjab Police of drug peddler's property.
Case Title: Amritpal Singh v. UNION OF INDIA
The Union Government informed the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday (March 04) that a committee for granting leave to Members of Parliament (MP) from attending sessions of the house met on March 03 and considered the cases of all the absent MPs, including Amritpal Singh.
Case Title: Bhisham Kinger v. State of Punjab and others
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has objected to the engagement of a private path lab for conducting basic tests like MRI, CT scans for a government hospital. A division bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel remarked, "This Court fails to understand as to why a private Laboratory is required to be engaged, when the State is duty bound under its sovereign function of providing basic health care facilities (which includes purchase of CT scan and MRI machines), which in present times are necessities of modern time hospital amenities to be available at District as well as Sub Division level hospitals."
Title: NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
Observing that project of national importance should not be halted due to lackadaisical approach of authorities, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the Punjab government to ensure the encumbrance-free possession of land for national highway projects, including the Delhi-Katra Expressway.
Title: Court on its own motion v. State of Punjab through its Chief Secretary
The Punjab & Haryana High Court sought fresh Affidavit from the Punjab Government on suo moto cognizance of village girl students dropping out of schools due to non-availability of schools and infrastructure along Punjab's Patiala-Rajpura Highway.