Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Impleadment of Parties"

Res Judicata Principle Applies To Different Stages Of Same Proceedings As Well : Supreme Court
After Rejection Of Objection To Impleadment, Subsequent Application To Delete Party Barred By Res Judicata : Supreme Court
Subsequent Purchaser, Though Not 'Necessary Party' In Specific Performance Suit, Can Be Impleaded As 'Proper Party' : Supreme Court
Arbitral Tribunal Can Proceed Against Party Though They Weren't Served With S.21 Notice Or Made Party In S.11 Application : Supreme Court
Person Holding Relevant Evidence To Dispute Not 'Necessary Party' Unless Compelled By Law: Rajasthan High Court Reiterates
Matrimonial Dispute Remains Between Couple, No Impleadment Can Be Allowed In Divorce Proceedings U/S 13B Hindu Marriage Act: Allahabad HC
Lis Pendens Doctrine Does Not Bar Property Purchaser From Seeking Impleadment In Suit : Supreme Court
Subsequent Purchaser/Donee May Be Impleaded As Parties In Suit For Specific Performance To Avoid Multiplicity Of Litigation: Rajasthan HC
Proposed Purchaser Of Joint Family Property Cannot Be Impleaded As Party Respondent In Suit For Partition: Karnataka High Court
OI R10 CPC | Stranger Can't Be Impleaded Merely Because It Intends To Support State In Contesting Suit & Protecting Alleged Govt Land: MP High Court
[O I R 10 CPC ] Party Executing Assignment Deed With Auctioneer After Successful Bidders Raise Dispute Qua Transaction Not Necessary Party: Calcutta HC
Order I Rule 10 CPC | Theory Of Dominus Litis Can't Be Overstretched To Exclude Necessary Parties From Suit: Bombay High Court