Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 27 Evidence Act"

S. 27 Evidence Act | Only Disclosure Leading To Recovery Of Weapon Admissible; Statement About Its Use Not Admissible : Supreme Court
S. 27 Evidence Act | Simultaneous Disclosure Statements Made By Multiple Accused Need Greater Scrutiny: Supreme Court
Chain Snatching | Recovery Of Stolen Items Not Sufficient For Conviction Without Identification Of Person Who Committed Theft: Kerala High Court
Recovery Of Drugs On Disclosure Statement Does Not Prima Facie Show Conscious Possession Of Contraband: J&K High Court
S. 27 Evidence Act | Disclosure Statements Alone Are Insufficient For Conviction Without Supporting Evidence : Supreme Court
S. 27 Evidence Act | Recovery Based On Statement By Accused Before Recording Of S.27 Disclosure Not Admissible : Supreme Court
Instruct IOs To Ensure Compliance Of Mandatory Safeguards Concerning Recoveries U/S 27 Evidence Act: Allahabad HC To UP DGP
S.27 Evidence Act Vulnerable To Abuse, Courts Must Be Vigilant About Its Frequent Use By Police: Chhattisgarh High Court
S. 27 Evidence Act | Statement Of Accused Inadmissible If No New Fact Is Discovered Pursuant To Disclosure: Supreme Court
S.27 Evidence Act | Discovery Not Vitiated Merely If Material 'Openly Accessible', Unless It Is Visible To 'Bare Eyes' Of People: Orissa High Court
S. 27 Evidence Act | Recovery Of Material Object On Disclosure Of Accused Doesn't Automatically Mean Offence Was Committed By Him: Punjab & Haryana High Court
To Prove S.27 Evidence Act Statement, Investigating Officer Must Narrate What Accused Stated; Merely Exhibiting Memorandum Not Enough : Supreme Court