Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 319 CrPC"

Exercise Of Power U/S 319 CrPC: "Primacy To Be Given To Evidence Recorded During Trial Over Material Collected During Investigation": Allahabad HC
Accused Can Be Summoned U/s 319 CrPC Even On The Basis Of Examination-In-Chief Of Witness: Supreme Court
Extra-Ordinary Power Of Trial Court Under Section 319 CrPC Should Be Exercised Sparingly, Reiterates Supreme Court
Cogent Evidence Required To Summon Any Person Under S.319 Of CrPC: Allahabad HC [Read Judgment]
Standard Of Proof For Summoning A Person As An Accused U/s 319 CrPC Higher Than That For Framing A Charge: SC [Read Judgment]
Section 319 CrPC: Persons Named In FIR, But Not Chargesheeted Can Be Summoned Even If Stage Of Protest Petition Is Over: SC [Read Judgment]
Section 319 CrPC: Can Additional Accused Be Summoned After Delivering Judgment With Respect To Co-Accused? SC Refers To Larger Bench [Read Order]
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability Of Complicity Of A Person Required: SC [Read Judgment]
Mere Disclosure Of Names By Some Witnesses During Trial Not Enough To Add Persons Not Named In FIR As Additional Accused: SC [Read Judgment]
A Person Added As Accused U/s 319 CrPC Can Be Tried Only For An Offence In Respect Of Which All The Accused Could Be Tried Together: SC [Read Judgment]
Person Once Discharged Can Also Be Added As Accused U/S 319 CrPC Based On New Materials [Read Judgment]
Section 319 CrPC: Courts Cannot Mechanically Summon Persons As Accused Not Named In Charge-Sheet Just Because A Witness Named Them, Says SC [Read Judgment]