SG: When Kesavananda Bharti was argued, bench was of the view that power to amend the constitution also include Article 386 itself- it was a catchy argument, Mr Pakhiwala gave extreme examples that it turn his way. He said, suppose some parliament is to surrender the sovereignity to queen, or suppose parliament will come out will bill that only certain people will be allowed to vote

CJI: voting rights were not available to everyone initially

SG: Constitution is fundamental document based on which nation subsists. Extreme examples are important to make sure nation can deal with extreme exgiency..What I said was even basic structure came into existence due to extreme examples

CJI: it first came in minority judgment