Datar: Laying down timelines is a part of the constitutional trust. Refers to another judgment CT Sivanandan.

What is important is consistency and predicability- once the bill is represented, if Supreme Court enforces a standard, it is completely fine in terms of protecting the cabinet system.

In judgment of natural resources, it does not lay down the correct law. It says, in advisory jurisdiction, mylords can clarify another judgment-very important, this is per incurim as it is contrary to Kerala Bill. Also, AG said that we are accepting the 2G judgment. My friends prepared a chart of the 15 presidential reference so far. In 2G, licenses were cancelled, court said give spectrum not on first cum basis.

In natural resources, the correctness of the 2G was questioned...they say, seriously problematic- overruling of principle is not outcome of appellant jurisdiction but inherent powers