Datar: In para 239 of two-judge bench, the Court says our interpretation should not be taken as timelines but timelines which serve as a benchmark for judicial review.

There has never been a reference of questions which have already been decided.

Last submission, Constitution does not provide everything. Now, I am asking- is there is a constitutional convention of approving the bill at earliest option? Article 111 and 200 are mirror images- if there is convention to approve the bill at the earliest, the same convention applies to Article 200. What is President to the Parliament, the Governor is to the state legislature.