Singhvi: mere withholding simplicter is an interim stage- de-facto we are on this side doing quia timet action barred by Kihoton-how two unlinkable are linked-completely misleading and red-herring. These are no quia timet actions at the first place. Simplicter is not an interim act but final act decision of intentional inaction not envisaged in Article 200. How holding back and keeping in cupboard an interim action? it completely killing the bill! its not medias res[meaning limbo].

1. there is nothing temporary about withholding simplicter

2. not askin to Speaker acting in tenth schedule

3. 361 does not touch upon decision which is open to challenge through judicial review