J Nath: coming back to previous question, the consequence of timeline has been provided, assent is granted by court and it can be challenged on ultra vires and it will come to this court and this deemed assent can be challenged by way of writ petition

Singhvi: after giving a judgment on law, your lordship does not whisper a word on merits of the bill

CJI: question is whether general timeline can be given under Article 142

Singhvi: you becoming a part of legislative process and then judging bill-both are two completely different thing...mylords will look at merits of the bill, it will not mix the separation of process. Ironically, one of the bills is under challenge before J Nath's bench where I am arguing.