SG: This is not a Vishakha situation but even if it is, the answer would be Section 386

CJI: We did not Telangana, where we said it is for the Speaker to decide

SG: wherever constitutional has used some words or not, it is constitutional cautious choice. Last submission, one extreme argument was that you can't do anything about Tamil Nadu issue. It is intra-party binding but your lordship have power to declare that it is not the correct law.

In 2G judgment, one of the issues was can

Sibal: this has nothing to do with the reference

CJI: but is there a question framed in this regard? We will be answering only those questions referred by President

SG: Mr Datar specifically said that TN judgment is the law of the land and you can't touch upon it, I am entitled to answer it. Reads the 2G reference.

Mylords inherent powers can allow to overlook the views expressed while maintaining it intra-party

CJI: two judge bench's law is not binding on constitution bench

SG: Datar's argument was that the view can't be touched