- Home
- /
- High Courts
- /
- Bombay High Court
- /
- Bombay High Court Weekly Round-Up:...
Bombay High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 25 to June 01
Narsi Benwal
5 Jun 2025 10:55 AM IST
Nominal Index [Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 198 to 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 201]SSK vs ASK, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 198Celebi Nas Airport Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs Mumbai International Airport, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 199KSS vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 200SGT vs NST, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 201Judgments:Mother Hiring Maid To Look After Child Not Ground To Deny Custody: Bombay High CourtCase...
Nominal Index [Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 198 to 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 201]
SSK vs ASK, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 198
Celebi Nas Airport Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs Mumbai International Airport, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 199
KSS vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 200
SGT vs NST, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 201
Judgments:
Mother Hiring Maid To Look After Child Not Ground To Deny Custody: Bombay High Court
Case Title: SSK vs ASK
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 198
A mother appointing a maid servant to take care of the child is not a ground to deny her the custody of the said child, the Bombay High Court held recently. Single-judge Justice RM Joshi pointed out that appointing maid servants to take care of children is not an 'uncommon' practice.
Case Title: Celebi Nas Airport Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs Mumbai International Airport
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 199
The Bombay High Court on Monday restrained the Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL) from taking a final decision in the bids invited on May 17 to replace Turkey-based Celebi for ground and bridge handling services at city's International airport, till the its (Celebi) challenge to cancellation of security clearance is heard by a regular bench after the summer vacations.
Case Title: KSS vs State of Maharashtra
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 200
The Bombay High Court on May 27 orally expressed its "shock" at the Maharashtra Police for arresting a 19-year-old engineering student who reshared a critical social media post on Indian Army's Operation Sindoor.A division bench of Justices Gauri Godse and Somasekhar Sundaresan had in the morning session criticised the State and the college authorities for treating her like a "criminal", instead of making an endaevour to reform her.
Case Title: SGT vs NST
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 201
"It is unbecoming of a Judge," remarked the Bombay High Court on May 27 while noting that a Family Court Judge did not grant any urgent hearing to a plea filed by a man seeking interim medical custody of his minor son, who is supposed to undergo an 'open heart' surgery. Single-judge Justice Rohit Joshi also expressed shock over the conduct of the man's wife (child's mother), who opposed the plea for interim custody and also the request for urgent hearing.
Other Developments:
While hearing a petition filed by a 19-year-old engineering student, who was arrested for making an allegedly objectionable post on 'Operation Sindoor' on social media, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday (May 27) remarked that the student has to be released adding that she had already faced the consequences after being rusticated by college.