Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 27 To November 02, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1366 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1422

NOMINAL INDEX

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. HARESH SINGH, ADVOCATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1366

THOPPANI SANJEEV RAO v. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1367

Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone) Zone 12 Delhi & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1368

BHUPENDER SINGH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1369

Nitco Logistics Pvt Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Customs Airport And General 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1370

STANLEY CHIMEIZI ALASONYE @UKA CHUKWU v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1371

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED versus BRITISH MARINE PLC 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1372

Punita Khatter v. Explorers Travel & Tour Pvt Ltd 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1374

SRI SAI SAPTHAGIRI SPONGE PVT. LTD v. THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1375

JAI MANGAL MEHTO v. STATE (GOVT. N.C.T. OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1376

ABDUL HAMEED REHMANI v. SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1377

GURBACHAN SINGH MATTA v. CENTRAL BAUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1378

UDAI PAL v. STATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1379

RENU ARORA AND OTHERS v. ST. MARGARET SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ANR & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1380

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1 v. M/S Agroha Fincap Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1381

VIVEK DEEP v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1382

P S JAYAKUMAR & ANR v. STATE (NCT of Delhi) & ANR and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1383

Mr. Gurdev Raj Kumar v. Collector Of Stamps (Government Of Nct Of Delhi) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1384

HARBANS SINGH v. ANAND TYAGI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1385

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SH ABHISHEK VERMA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1386

VIRENDER SINGH BIDHURI v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1387

Prof. Madhu Kishwar v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1388

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS v. AMIT KUMAR & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1389

ANI Media Pvt Ltd v. Dynamite News Network Private Limited & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1390

Nora Beniwal v. Union of India & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1391

Mrs Shumita Sandhu v. Mrs Tani Sandhu Bhargava 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1392

Mecwel Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. GE Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1393

Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences (IHBAS) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1394

RUSHANT MALHOTRA & ORS v. THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1395

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. NITIN BANSAL 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1396

X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1397

Devyani Kundra v. State Of NCT Of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1398

Mr Krishan Lal Gulati & Anr. v. State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1399

Jamia Teachers Association v. Jamia Millia Islamia 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1400

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI v. TAUHID KHAN @ SHAHID @ LAMBA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1401

Subhash Pahwa @ Subhash Chander v. State NCT of Delhi 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1402

Archana Chaudhary v. Harsh Dawar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1403

Chetna Gautam v. The Union of India & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1404

X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1405

Union of India v. Smt. Guddi Bisht W/O Late Hav Puran Chandra Singh Bisht 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1406

DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR v. SAHIL LOHCHAB & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1407

ARVIND BHATNAGAR v. STATE & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1408

Patil Shivaji Madhukar v. UoI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1409

Prabhat Singh Charak v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1410

MAHARASHTRA CARROM ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1411

M/s Connoisseur Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. through Mr. Anil Sharma (Ex-Director) v. Official Liquidator of M/s Connoisseur Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1412

Union of India v. Ajay Kumar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1413

Air India Limited v. Airport Employees Union (Regd.) & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1414

MISS KIARA RAWAT THROUGH MRS. LOVELY GUSAIN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1415

SURENDER KUMAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1416

Suresh Sankhla vs. Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1417

Neeraj Agarwal v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1418

TAPAS KUMAR MALLICK & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1419

COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1420

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Himalyan Flora And Aromas Pvt Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1421

COOMI KAPOOR v. NETFLIX ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES INDIA LLP & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1422

Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. HARESH SINGH, ADVOCATE

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1366

The Delhi High Court has discharged a lawyer in a criminal contempt case for misbehaving with a woman judge and intimidating her by using derogatory and threatening language.

Title: THOPPANI SANJEEV RAO v. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION & ORS

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1367

The Delhi High Court has said that Police officials must treat women with dignity and avoid using inappropriate language with them.

Case title: Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone) Zone 12 Delhi & Ors.

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1368

The Delhi High Court has held that Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act, 1932 is not an embargo to suits filed by unregistered firms, if any statutory or common law right is being sought to be enforced.

Sex Determination Undermines Value Of Female Life, Strikes At Hope Of 'Discrimination Free Society': Delhi High Court

Title: BHUPENDER SINGH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1369

The Delhi High Court has observed that the practice of sex determination undermines value of female life and strikes at the hope of a discrimination free society.

Case title: Nitco Logistics Pvt Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Customs Airport And General

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1370

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a Customs Housing Agent is responsible for the actions of its employees and it must exercise due diligence in supervising their activities.

Title: STANLEY CHIMEIZI ALASONYE @UKA CHUKWU v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & other connected matter

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1371

The Delhi High Court ruled that the version of the police cannot be disbelieved merely because the search and seizure of narcotics under the NDPS Act is not videographed or photographed.

Case Title: STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED versus BRITISH MARINE PLC

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1372

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) against an arbitral award passed in favor of British Marine PLC.(Respondent).

Case title: Punita Khatter v. Explorers Travel & Tour Pvt Ltd

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1374

The Delhi High Court has held that an employee is strictly liable under Section 452 of the Companies Act 2013 to return company property, at the end of his/ her employment.

Title: SRI SAI SAPTHAGIRI SPONGE PVT. LTD v. THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1375

The Delhi High Court has observed that the cheques issued only for security purpose and not for depositing to the bank are not encashable for any existing debt or liability.

Title: JAI MANGAL MEHTO v. STATE (GOVT. N.C.T. OF DELHI)

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1376

The Delhi High Court has observed that change of the clothes of a minor rape victim under the POCSO Act before her medical examination cannot weaken the prosecution evidence.

Title: ABDUL HAMEED REHMANI v. SPECIAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1377

The Delhi High Court has observed that legal heirs have right to seek Impleadment after the appellant's death in pending appeals under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.

Title: GURBACHAN SINGH MATTA v. CENTRAL BAUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & other connected matter

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1378

The Delhi High Court has held that criminal prosecution cannot continue when the departmental proceedings as well as the Vigilance inquiry have found no merit in the allegations against an individual.

Title: UDAI PAL v. STATE

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1379

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the prosecution must prove that the minor rape victim was below the age of 16 years, for securing conviction of the accused in cases commencing prior to Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.

Title: RENU ARORA AND OTHERS v. ST. MARGARET SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ANR & other connected matters

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1380

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the Committees appointed by the Court on zonal and central level to decide on fee hike and payment of teachers of unaided private schools in the national capital cannot perform judicial functions.

Case title: Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1 v. M/S Agroha Fincap Ltd.

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1381

The Delhi High Court has held that the Income Tax Commissioner's order granting sanction under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act 1961 for reopening assessment after four years of the relevant Assessment Year (AY) can be in the words— “Yes, I am convinced”.

Title: VIVEK DEEP v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1382

The Delhi High Court has observed that an accused can be denied anticipatory bail if he has been posting complainant's photographs on social media using inappropriate language as well as making posts against the judge or investigating agency.

Title: P S JAYAKUMAR & ANR v. STATE (NCT of Delhi) & ANR and other connected matters

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1383

The Delhi High Court has held that banks cannot be summoned as an accused for defamation as they lack the state of mind or mens rea necessary to constitute the offence.

Case title: Mr. Gurdev Raj Kumar v. Collector Of Stamps (Government Of Nct Of Delhi)

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1384

The Delhi High Court has held that GST cannot be levied on renting/ leasing of residential premises for use as residence.

Title: HARBANS SINGH v. ANAND TYAGI

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1385

The Delhi High Court has observed that mere omission by a landlord to disclose other properties owned by him will not disentitle him from obtaining eviction of a tenant for bonafide use of the tenanted premises.

Title: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SH ABHISHEK VERMA & ORS

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1386

The Delhi High Court has allowed recording of evidence of a US based prosecution witness via video conferencing in an Official Secrets Act case concerning businessman Abhishek Verma.

Title: VIRENDER SINGH BIDHURI v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1387

The Delhi High Court has observed that assaulting a woman and using caste based remarks against her on a flyover falls within the meaning of “public view” to satisfy the offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Case title: Prof. Madhu Kishwar v. State

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1388

The Delhi High Court has quashed an attempt to murder case lodged against commentator Prof. Madhu Kishwar back in 2008, over an alleged altercation with the Basoya family while she was clicking pictures of alleged unauthorised constructions in the city for her organization, Manushi.

Rejecting Physically Disabled Individual's Candidature Citing No Vacancy Defeats RPwD Act: Delhi High Court

Title: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS v. AMIT KUMAR & ORS

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1389

The Delhi High Court has ruled that rejecting a physically disabled individual's candidature citing no vacancy for such individuals defeats the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

Title: ANI Media Pvt Ltd v. Dynamite News Network Private Limited & Anr

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1390

The Delhi High Court rejected an appeal filed by news agency Asian News International (ANI), challenging a single judge order passed in its copyright infringement suit against news platform Dynamite News.

Title: Nora Beniwal v. Union of India & Ors

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1391

The Delhi High Court asked the authorities to take steps to provide better digital access to the students in higher education in various disciples and to also minimise the “digital divide.”

Case title: Mrs Shumita Sandhu v. Mrs Tani Sandhu Bhargava

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1392

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that mere failure of a party, alleging that a document is fraud, to provide particulars of such fraud doesn't lead to a conclusion that the party has admitted the genuineness of such document.

Case Title: Mecwel Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. GE Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd.

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1393

The Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under section 25 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) on account of non-filing of statement of claim does not amount to an arbitral award and therefore cannot be challenged under section 34.

Case Title: Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Institute of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences (IHBAS)

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1394

The Delhi High Court held that an award passed after expiry of the arbitrator's mandate is non-est and unforceable holding that the court has no power to extend the mandate post award if no application seeking extension of the mandate was pending before the award was passed.

Title: RUSHANT MALHOTRA & ORS v. THE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1395

The Delhi High Court ordered retrospective payment of enhanced remuneration of Rs. 80,000 per month to its law researchers with effect from October 01, 2022.

Delhi High Court Sentences Man To One Month Jail For Threatening Local Commissioner With Gun

Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. NITIN BANSAL

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1396

The Delhi High Court sentenced a man to one month of simple imprisonment, along with Rs. 2,000 fine for threatening a Court appointment Local Commissioner with a pistol during execution of the commission.

Title: X v. Y

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1397

The Delhi High Court set out the key principles to be followed while determining maintenance to the wife and child, while also calling for reasoned orders by Family and Mahila Courts in the national capital.

Case title: Devyani Kundra v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1398

The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a young law graduate booked for the murder of her mother, citing the welfare of her minor child.

Case title: Mr Krishan Lal Gulati & Anr. v. State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr.

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1399

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a party cannot be sued under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonor of cheques issued by it, if presented by a dissolved company.

Case title: Jamia Teachers Association v. Jamia Millia Islamia

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1400

The Delhi High Court has quashed two office orders and an advisory issued by Jamia Millia Islamia, dissolving the Jamia Teachers Association (JTA), an autonomous body of varsity teachers constituted in the year 1967 and administered through an Executive Committee elected by its members.

Title: STATE OF NCT OF DELHI v. TAUHID KHAN @ SHAHID @ LAMBA & ORS

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1401

The Delhi High Court has ruled that recovery of a contraband cannot be attributed to an accused under the NDPS Act without any proof of possession or independent witnesses.

Case title: Subhash Pahwa @ Subhash Chander v. State NCT of Delhi

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1402

The Delhi High Court has held that a plea of guilt made by an accused does not efface the rule against double jeopardy and a Court cannot conduct second prosecution for the same offence, based on such a plea.

Case title: Archana Chaudhary v. Harsh Dawar

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1403

The Delhi High Court has held that the provision to recall any person as a witness under Section 311 CrPC is meant to ensure justice, and is not a tool to delay proceedings in a criminal trial.

Title: Chetna Gautam v. The Union of India & Ors

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1404

The Delhi High Court refused to entertain two petitions filed challenging the certification given to “The Taj Story” film which is slated to be released on October 31.

Title: X v. Y

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1405

The Delhi High Court has observed that when the residential rights of a daughter in law have been protected under the Domestic Violence Act, the right of senior citizens, being the in-laws, to live in their house without distress cannot be suspended indefinitely.

Case title: Union of India v. Smt. Guddi Bisht W/O Late Hav Puran Chandra Singh Bisht

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1406

The Delhi High Court has upheld an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, directing the Central government to pay arrears of special family pension to the widow of an army personnel, who died back in 1978.

Title: DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR v. SAHIL LOHCHAB & ORS

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1407

The Delhi High Court has ruled that the waitlist panel cannot operate in a segregated manner, especially when the selection process of recruitment involves provisional result.

Title: ARVIND BHATNAGAR v. STATE & ANR

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1408

The Delhi High Court has observed that a matrimonial FIR cannot be quashed if the settlement agreement between the estranged couple is not executed.

Case title: Patil Shivaji Madhukar v. UoI

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1409

The Delhi High Court has upheld the dismissal of a Border Security Force Sub-Inspector for developing illicit relations with a colleague's wife.

Case title: Prabhat Singh Charak v. Union of India

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1410

A CRPF personnel serving the nation deserved better treatment, remarked the Delhi High Court while lamenting the 20 years long battle fought by a sub-inspector to get clearance in disciplinary proceedings.

Title: MAHARASHTRA CARROM ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR & other connected matters

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1411

The Delhi High Court has restrained the All India Carrom Federation (AICF) from using the expression “India” or “Indian” in its name or logo or in the further competitions conducted by it.

Case Name: M/s Connoisseur Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. through Mr. Anil Sharma (Ex-Director) v. Official Liquidator of M/s Connoisseur Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1412

A division bench of the Delhi High Court, comprising Justice Anil Kshetrapal and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, has upheld the liability of a company to reimburse the official liquidator's security expenses for safeguarding corporate assets.

Case title: Union of India v. Ajay Kumar

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1413

The Delhi High Court has slammed the Railway authorities for forcing into litigation a medal-winning boxer, working under the sportspersons quota, for increments due to him.

Case title: Air India Limited v. Airport Employees Union (Regd.) & Anr.

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1414

The Delhi High Court has ordered the Labour Court to reconsider the maintainability of an application filed by the Airport Employees Union against Air India Limited, seeking parity of pay for sub-contract workers.

Title: MISS KIARA RAWAT THROUGH MRS. LOVELY GUSAIN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1415

The Delhi High Court has constituted a Committee to supervise and oversee the operation of Union Government's crowd funding digital platform for treatment of people with rare diseases.

Title: SURENDER KUMAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1416

The Delhi High Court has directed the Director General (Prisons) to frame and notify a SOP on the access of mobile phones to open-prison inmates.

Superior Authority Not Bound To Record Or Communicate Detailed Reasons When Rejecting Representation Against Adverse Remarks: Delhi HC

Case Name : Suresh Sankhla vs. Union of India & Ors.

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1417

A Division bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav held that a superior authority rejecting a representation against adverse remarks is not legally obligated to record or communicate detailed reasons for its decision.

Case title: Neeraj Agarwal v. State

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1418

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that a bail condition, precluding a doctor, allegedly involved in a medical offence, from running his own medical centre, does not violate such a doctor's right to livelihood under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

Title: TAPAS KUMAR MALLICK & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1419

The Delhi High Court has permitted an intending couple to move ahead with surrogacy procedure, despite the husband being above the maximum age limit prescribed under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.

Title: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. STATE

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1420

The Delhi High Court has ruled that upon committal of a case, only the Court of Sessions can order further investigation and not an ilaqa magistrate.

Case Name: Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Himalyan Flora And Aromas Pvt Ltd.

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1421

The Delhi High Court, while hearing an appeal u/s 37 of the A&C Act filed against the the Award dated 11.12.2024 (“Impugned Award”) passed by the Emergency Arbitrator under the Delhi International Arbitration Center (Arbitration Proceedings) Rules, 2023 (“Rules of 2023”) observed that the terms 'Emergency Arbitrator' and 'Arbitral Tribunal' are not interchangeable. Rule 14.11 of the Rules of 2023 bars the Emergency Arbitrator from being a part of the Arbitral Tribunal, except otherwise agreed by the parties.

Title: COOMI KAPOOR v. NETFLIX ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES INDIA LLP & ANR

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1422

The Delhi High Court has closed a suit filed by Coomi Kapoor- senior journalist and author of the book “The Emergency: A Personal History”, against Manikarnika Films and Netflix over alleged breach of contract and damaging her reputation.