- Home
- /
- High Courts
- /
- Delhi High Court
- /
- Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up:...
Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: September 29 To October 05, 2025
Nupur Thapliyal
6 Oct 2025 8:00 PM IST
Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1210 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1251NOMINAL INDEXMS AM v. GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1210 DIRECTOR GENERAL v. SANJEEV KUMAR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1211 K v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1212 S.N.BHARDWAJ ADVOCATE v. ARCHCOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1213 LT GEN INDERJIT SINGH AVSM VSM (RETD)...
Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1210 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1251
NOMINAL INDEX
MS AM v. GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1210
DIRECTOR GENERAL v. SANJEEV KUMAR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1211
K v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1212
S.N.BHARDWAJ ADVOCATE v. ARCHCOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1213
LT GEN INDERJIT SINGH AVSM VSM (RETD) v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1214
QADIR AHMED v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1215
EKOH COLLINS CHIDUBEM v. NCB & other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1216
Helsinn Healthcare Sa & Anr. v. Hetero Healthcare Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1217
Surender Kumar v. GNCTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1218
M/s Sharma Trading Company v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1219
M/s Sharma Trading Company v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1220
HARSHEETA THAKUR v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1221
VIKAS KUMAR YOGI v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1222
BRIJ BALLABH GAUR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1223
BNP Paribas Suisse SA v. Ashok Kumar Goel & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1224
AJMER SINGH ALIAS PINKA v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO KANJAWALA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1225
NEETI SHARMA & ANR v. KAILASH CHAND GUPTA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1226
M/S Dart Air Services Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Customs (Airport And General) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1227
RAJNISH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1228
EBC Publishing (P) Ltd & Anr v. Rupa Publications India Private Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1229
MATTEL INC v. PADUM BORAH AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1230
UMAR HARIS v. YUSRA MERAJ & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1231
Revacure Lifesciences LLP & Ors. v. State & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1232
Sunil Maan v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1233
M/S A. L. Exports Through Its Proprietor Arsh v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1234
Akkineni Nagarjuna v. X & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1235
MEENAKSHI TYAGI v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1236
ABID KHAN v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1237
SELECT CITYWALK RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. VARDHMAN AMRANTE PRIVATE LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1238
VIPIN AHUJA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1239
AKHILESH AND ORS v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1240
AKBAR ALI & ANR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1241
RAVI SHANKAR v. JOHN DOE(S) / ASHOK KUMAR(S) & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1242
X v. Y & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1243
JSW Ispat Special Products Limited v Bharat Petroresources Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1244
AAI v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1245
Transformative Learning Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax Delhi East & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1246
NAVEEN YADAV v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1247
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Brinton Pharmaceuticals Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1248
Ms. Puja Jayant & Ors. v. Commissioner Of Customs, IGI Airport 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1249
Quentin Decon v. Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1250
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Biodiscovery Lifesciences Private Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1251
Title: MS AM v. GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1210
The Delhi High Court has pulled up a mother for choosing her minor daughter “as a weapon” to settle personal scores with her estranged husband by lodging a case against him under the POCSO Act.
Title: DIRECTOR GENERAL v. SANJEEV KUMAR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1211
The Delhi High Court has restored the penalty of stoppage of two increments imposed on an Assistant Superintendent of Tihar Jail in 2005 over allegations of ill-treatment of jail inmates and extortion of money.
Title: K v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1212
The Delhi High Court has observed that the act of a mother of silencing her minor daughter and permitting an accused to sexually abuse and assault her amounts to “abetment” under Section 17 of the POCSO Act.
Title: S.N.BHARDWAJ ADVOCATE v. ARCHCOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA & other connected matters
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1213
The Delhi High Court has constituted a Committee for conducting a survey and devising a joint policy decision for removal of illegal encroachments and rehabilitation of those who may be required to be uprooted and displaced in an around city's Tughlaqabad Fort.
Title: LT GEN INDERJIT SINGH AVSM VSM (RETD) v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1214
The Delhi High Court has quashed a rape and sexual assault case against a 70 year old retired Indian Army officer, observing that the allegations against him were "inherently absurd".
Title: QADIR AHMED v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1215
The Delhi High Court has observed that United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) certification is not a substitute for a valid visa for foreign nationals under the Foreigners Act, 1946.
Title: EKOH COLLINS CHIDUBEM v. NCB & other connected matter
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1216
The Delhi High Court has denied bail to two men in an alleged drug trafficking syndicate case, observing that ignorance of the nature of contraband is no defence under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Case title: Helsinn Healthcare Sa & Anr. v. Hetero Healthcare Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1217
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that merely because a written statement (WS), filed belatedly, is served by the Defendant on the Plaintiff, the same would not obligate the latter to file his rejoinder/ replication within 45 days thereafter.
Case title: Surender Kumar v. GNCTD
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1218
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that Delhi Metro's 'Relocation and Rehabilitation policy in respect of project affected persons' does not contemplate rehabilitation for shopowners whose shops are acquired for a project, unless they are 'doing business' from the said shop.
Case title: M/s Sharma Trading Company v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1219
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that when GST rates applicable on a given product are reduced by the GST Council, its benefit should trickle down to the end consumer by reduction in prices of such products.
Case title: M/s Sharma Trading Company v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1220
The Delhi High Court has held that an authority constituted under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 can order businesses to reduce their prices following reduction in GST rates applicable to their products.
Title: HARSHEETA THAKUR v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1221
The Delhi High Court has called for balance between combating dowry harassment and cruelty from the society, and the rights of innocent individuals roped in such cases due to distant relationship with the accused.
Title: VIKAS KUMAR YOGI v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1222
The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered against Aam Aadmi Party Media Coordinator Vikas Kumar Yogi over an altercation with a female journalist, after the parties entered into a settlement.
Title: BRIJ BALLABH GAUR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1223
While quashing an FIR between neighbours over a fight, the Delhi High Court has asked the accused parties to hold “bhandara” for poor children on two occasions- Navratra and Diwali.
Case title: BNP Paribas Suisse SA v. Ashok Kumar Goel & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1224
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that parallel enforcement of a foreign decree is permissible under Section 44A CPC i.e., when the decree is being executed both in the cause country (where decree was passed) and in India.
Title: AJMER SINGH ALIAS PINKA v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO KANJAWALA
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1225
The Delhi High Court has observed that the right to perform last rites of a parent is an essential religious and moral duty and denial of parole in such a case violates a convict's right to dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Title: NEETI SHARMA & ANR v. KAILASH CHAND GUPTA & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1226
The Delhi High Court has fined two litigants for filing a transfer petition by “making and cooking up an imaginary story” and casting aspersions based on “misleading and mythical” assertions on a sitting trial court judge.
Case title: M/S Dart Air Services Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Customs (Airport And General)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1227
The Delhi High Court has held that the Commissioner of Customs can impose a penalty on a courier service which fails to report suspicious consignments being sent or received from abroad.
Title: RAJNISH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1228
The Delhi High Court has observed that the act of a minor victim not calling the sexual acts as forcible in her initial statements cannot exculpate the accused under the POCSO Act.
Case title: EBC Publishing (P) Ltd & Anr v. Rupa Publications India Private Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1229
The Delhi High Court has restrained Rupa Publications from publishing or selling its 'coat pocket' edition of the Constitution of India bare act, in a trademark infringement suit filed by Eastern Book Company (EBC).
Title: MATTEL INC v. PADUM BORAH AND ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1230
Granting relief to Mattel Inc, the Delhi High Court has restrained a man from using “Barbie” trademarks in relation to commercial kitchen equipment, event management and catering services.
Title: UMAR HARIS v. YUSRA MERAJ & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1231
The Delhi High Court has observed that a divorced wife is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 or CrPC, it respective of the ground or the manner of divorce.
Case title: Revacure Lifesciences LLP & Ors. v. State & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1232
The Delhi High Court recently quashed a FIR under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940— lodged by the Police at the direction of a Magistrate under Section 156(3) CrPC.
Case title: Sunil Maan v. State
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1233
The Delhi High Court has made it clear that release on bail under Section 436A of CrPC is not automatic even where the offence alleged does not entail death penalty.
Case title: M/S A. L. Exports Through Its Proprietor Arsh v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1234
The Delhi High Court recently came across a peculiar case relating to Input Tax Credit refund claim, whereby a notice for personal hearing was issued to the trader, after the Appellate Authority rejected its plea.
Title: Akkineni Nagarjuna v. X & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1235
The Delhi High Court has passed an interim order protecting the personality rights of Telugu actor Nagarjuna Akkineni by restraining various entities from misusing his image, name, voice or other elements of his persona for monetary gains without his consent or authorization.
Title: MEENAKSHI TYAGI v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1236
The Delhi High Court has deprecated the practice of filing petitions without jurisdiction, adding that it may be necessary to impose costs, even at the stage of withdrawal of the matters.
Title: ABID KHAN v. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1237
The Delhi High Court has rejected a plea filed by a candidate seeking to recalculate his OMR evaluation and to revise his result and rank in relation to the National Eligibility Entrance Test (UG) 2025.
Title: SELECT CITYWALK RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR v. VARDHMAN AMRANTE PRIVATE LIMITED
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1238
The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to Select Citywalk Retail Private Limited and restrained a real estate developer from using “Vardhman Citywalk” mark.
Title: VIPIN AHUJA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1239
The Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR against a man accused of assaulting a doctor on duty, asking him to do one month community service at the same hospital.
Title: AKHILESH AND ORS v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1240
The Delhi High Court has said that quashing a case of child marriage and sexual offences over settlement between the parties would grant “judicial imprimatur” to the unlawful conduct which the Parliament seeks to deter.
Title: AKBAR ALI & ANR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1241
The Delhi High Court has quashed a sexual harassment case following settlement and an undertaking by the two accused to do two months of community service at city's Jama Masjid.
Title: RAVI SHANKAR v. JOHN DOE(S) / ASHOK KUMAR(S) & ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1242
The Delhi High Court has passed a john doe order protecting the personality rights of “The Art of Living” foundation founder, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar.
Title: X v. Y & other connected matters
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1243
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a husband cannot claim exclusive ownership of a property jointly held by both the spouses, merely on the ground that he alone paid the EMIs.
Case Title – JSW Ispat Special Products Limited v Bharat Petroresources Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1244
The Delhi High Court Bench of Justice Jyoti Singh has observed that claims which are not a part of the Resolution Plan on the date of approval, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to arbitrate such claims. Put differently, post-insolvency commencement date claims which are not made a part of the Resolution Plan are not arbitrable.
Case title: AAI v. Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1245
The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere with an order of the GST authority rejecting CENVAT Credit to the tune of Rs.9.34 crores claimed by the Airport Authority of India.
Case title: Transformative Learning Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax Delhi East & Anr
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1246
The Delhi High Court has held that a Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate (FIRC) need not correspond to each individual transaction and it may reflect a period as a whole, provided that the overall benefit being claimed is fully substantiated by the total foreign exchange remittance.
Title: NAVEEN YADAV v. STATE NCT OF DELHI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1247
The Delhi High Court has observed that calling off a marriage after the courtship period, after reasoned choice, cannot be termed as breach of promise to marry.
Case title: Mankind Pharma Limited v. Brinton Pharmaceuticals Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1248
The Delhi High Court has restrained Maharashtra-based Brinton Pharmaceuticals from using the mark ACNESCAR, or any other mark which is confusing or deceptively similar to Mankind Pharma's ACNESTAR.
Case title: Ms. Puja Jayant & Ors. v. Commissioner Of Customs, IGI Airport
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1249
The Delhi High Court has asked the Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi Police to conduct an enquiry into alleged forgery of Customs stamps at the Delhi International Airport.
Case title: Quentin Decon v. Customs
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1250
The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a foreign national, incarcerated for over 4 years in connection with a drug trafficking case.
In doing so, Justice Arun Monga noted that the Investigating Officer had himself admitted during cross-examination that the seized substance had been mixed before sampling, making it impossible to identify which packet the samples sent for testing came from or their individual weights.
Case title: Mankind Pharma Limited v. Biodiscovery Lifesciences Private Limited
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1251
The Delhi High Court has granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favour of Mankind Pharma, in relation to its 'Kind' family of marks.