- Home
- /
- High Courts
- /
- High Court of J & K and Ladakh
- /
- Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High...
Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Round-Up: April 21 April 27, 2025
LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
28 April 2025 9:05 PM IST
Nominal Index:State of J&K vs Ishtiyaq Ali 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 152Kuldeep Sharma vs UT if J&K &Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 153Abdul Gani and another vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 154Gulzar Begum and another vs Raja Begum and others 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 155Sita Ram vs UT if J&K &Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 156Falaq Mukhtar Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 157Anil Kumar Yadav...
Nominal Index:
State of J&K vs Ishtiyaq Ali 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 152
Kuldeep Sharma vs UT if J&K &Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 153
Abdul Gani and another vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 154
Gulzar Begum and another vs Raja Begum and others 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 155
Sita Ram vs UT if J&K &Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 156
Falaq Mukhtar Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 157
Anil Kumar Yadav Vs Directorate of Enforcement 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 158
Ranjit Kour & Another Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 159
Anamika Devi Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 160
Dinesh Kumar Vs UT Of Leh 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 161
Mohammad Shafiq Dar vs Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 162
Abdul Majid Bhat vs Gulzar Ahmad Bhat 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 163
Jammu Cooperative House Building Society Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 164
Rahil Chowdhary Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 165
Tsewang Thinles Vs UT Of Ladakh 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 166
J&K HORTICULTURE PRODUCE MARKETING AND PROCESSING CORPORATION Vs ABDUL RAZAK MALLA & OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 167
Judgments/Orders:
Case-Title: State of J&K vs Ishtiyaq Ali
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 152
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that in the absence of any substantial and credible evidence or any prior complaints, FIRs, or consistent testimony of cruelty over the 30-year marriage, it cannot be proved that the accused has abetted or instigated the commission of suicide of his deceased wife.
Case-Title:- Kuldeep Sharma vs UT if J&K &Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 153
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that even if there are multiple FIRs against the applicant seeking renewal of his arms license, the licensing authority is bound by statute to call for the police verification report from the concerned police station before refusing to renew the arms license.
Case-Title: Abdul Gani and another vs UT of J&K,
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 154
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that if no award is passed within two years after the declaration is made, the entire land acquisition proceedings shall stand lapsed unless stayed by the court.
Case-Title: Gulzar Begum and another vs Raja Begum and others
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 155
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that where in a suit right to possession is claimed or disputed and it is referable to the officer or the authority appointed under the Agrarian Reforms Act, the Civil Court is debarred from settling such a dispute.
Case-Title:- Sita Ram vs UT if J&K &Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 156
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that the claim of the petitioners to avail the benefit of a mistake of fact, despite the mistake having been detected and corrected, is totally misconceived and cannot be accepted.
Case Title: Falaq Mukhtar Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 157
The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court dismissed a petition challenging the Government Order No. 383-JK(HME) of 2024, which altered the selection criteria for Senior Residents/Registrars in Government Dental and Medical Colleges.
Case Title: Anil Kumar Yadav Vs Directorate of Enforcement
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 158
Clarifying the legal framework regarding the applicability of the old and new criminal procedural laws, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh ruled that the relevant factor for determining the applicability of BNSS or CrPC, 1973, is the stage of the case prevailing immediately prior to 01.07.2024.
Case Title: Ranjit Kour & Another Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 159
Reinforcing the protective scope of Section 498A IPC, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, while rejecting two petitions seeking quashing of an FIR lodged under sections 498A and 109 IPC, held that “if the conduct of husband or his relatives is accompanied with an intention to cause grave injury to a woman, whether or not she was driven to commit suicide or inflict grave injury upon herself, is immaterial, it would amount to cruelty within the meaning of Section 498A IPC.”
Case Title: Anamika Devi Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 160
Reinforcing individual autonomy and constitutional liberties, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, while disposing of a protection plea filed by a young married couple, ruled that two adults choosing each other in marriage is a constitutional right, not subject to family or community approval.
Case Title: Dinesh Kumar Vs UT Of Leh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 161
The Jammu and Kashmir & Ladakh High Court underscored the inherent vulnerability of child witnesses in courtroom settings while upholding the conviction of Dinesh Kumar for sexually assaulting a minor girl in Leh in the year 2017.
Case-Title:Mohammad Shafiq Dar vs Union Territory of J&K & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 162
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that submitting a certificate issued by an unrecognised organisation could at best be considered as invalid for the purposes of recruitment but same does not amount to fraud or misrepresentation on the part of the candidate.
Case-Title: Abdul Majid Bhat vs Gulzar Ahmad Bhat
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 163
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that merely because the gift under muslim law is a registered one does not obivate the possibility of the gift being invalid. The court said that what is important in muslim law while executing a gift deed is that all the essential conditions required to valid gift are present.
J&K Provident Fund Act | PF Coverage Without Gazette Notification Is 'Non Est' In Law: High Court
Case Title: Jammu Cooperative House Building Society Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 164
Reinforcing the legal sanctity of Gazette notifications for the applicability of labour welfare statutes, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh ruled that unless a notification under Subsection (4) of Section 1 of the Jammu and Kashmir Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1961 is issued and published in the Official Gazette, any proceedings regarding registration of a cooperative society under the Act are “non est in the eyes of law.”
Case Title: Rahil Chowdhary Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 165
Reaffirming the judiciary's restraint in matters of policy, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, while dismissing a writ petition seeking cancellation of mining leases, held that courts cannot conduct a comparative study of methods for distribution of natural resources, as such decisions fall within the exclusive domain of the Executive.
Case Title: Tsewang Thinles Vs UT Of Ladakh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 166
Clarifying the jurisdiction of Special Courts under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the Special Court is empowered not just to determine the age of the accused, but also of the victim.
Case Title: J&K HORTICULTURE PRODUCE MARKETING AND PROCESSING CORPORATION Vs ABDUL RAZAK MALLA & OTHERS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 167
Reiterating a significant principle of employment law, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh held that the doctrine of "no work no pay" cannot be pressed into service when an employee is kept away from work by the act or omission of the employer.