- Home
- /
- High Courts
- /
- High Court of J & K and Ladakh
- /
- J&K High Court Weekly Round-Up:...
J&K High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 7 To July 13, 2025
LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
16 July 2025 7:50 PM IST
Nominal Index:Mohd Khalil Qazi Vs State of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 252M/S Durga Enterprises Vs FCI & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 253Maan Chand vs State 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 254Parveen Begum vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 255MUSHTAQ AHMAD SHAH & ORS vs UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 256UT Of J&K & ORS VS MRS. RAJINDER OBEROI 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 257WASEEM QURESHI vs...
Nominal Index:
Mohd Khalil Qazi Vs State of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 252
M/S Durga Enterprises Vs FCI & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 253
Maan Chand vs State 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 254
Parveen Begum vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 255
MUSHTAQ AHMAD SHAH & ORS vs UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 256
UT Of J&K & ORS VS MRS. RAJINDER OBEROI 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 257
WASEEM QURESHI vs STATE OF J&K AND ANOTHER 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 258
Sushant Khajuria Vs J&K Bank 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 259
ASIF AMIN CHALKOO & ORS vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 260
UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ORS. VS SALEEMA BEGUM & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 261
Abdul Aziz Reshi Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 262
U.T. OF J&K vs SHAKEEL AHMAD BHAT 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 263
Naveed Bashir Wani Vs Varqa Bashir & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 264
Iqbal Singh vs Pankaj Sharma 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 265
Dr Noor Mohammad Bilal Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 266
IQBAL MUBARIK Vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 267
M/S PMT Industries Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 268
Met Life India Insurance Company Ltd vs Abdul Aziz Khan 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 269
Peerzada Muneer Ahmad vs Aaliya Anjum 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 270
Syed Jameel Qaiser & Ors Vs J&K State Cable Car Corp 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 271
MOHAMMAD AKBAR SHEIKH vs MST JANA AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 272
Amir Medical Store Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 273
Judgments/Orders:
Case Title: Mohd Khalil Qazi Vs State of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 252
The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, while dismissing a 34-year-old writ petition challenging deportation orders, held that "The petitioners have acted in their own volition and acquired the citizenship of a foreign Country. Their passports and the residential permit issued in their favour are cogent, unequivocal evidence of the fact that the petitioners are not citizens of India and, as such, orders to deport them were valid."
Case Title: M/S Durga Enterprises Vs FCI & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 253
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh directed the Food Corporation of India (FCI) to refund an amount of ₹7,93,456 to a transport contractor, M/s Durga Enterprises, after holding that recoveries made retrospectively based on revised route distances were illegal and contrary to contractual terms and policy guidelines.
Case-Title: Maan Chand vs State
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 254
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court acquitted a man convicted for murder, pointing to multiple shortcomings in the prosecution's case, including variations and contradictions in the initial report and testimony of key witnesses and conflicting accounts of the type of weapons used, the manner of assault, and nature of injuries.
Case-Title: Parveen Begum vs UT of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 255
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court refused to entertain a writ petition seeking reinvestigation or alteration of charges in an alleged assault and disrobing case, directing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the trial court.
A bench of Justice Sanjay Parihar observed that the petitioner had an adequate opportunity before the trial court to raise her grievances, and that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked unless a manifest error or miscarriage of justice is established.
Case-Title: MUSHTAQ AHMAD SHAH & ORS vs UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 256
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court delivered a judgment reinforcing the legal principle that “one ad hoc arrangement cannot be replaced by another of similar nature,” and criticised the University of Kashmir for replacing contractual faculty with visiting and guest lecturers.
Case-Title: UT Of J&K & ORS VS MRS. RAJINDER OBEROI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 257
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court upheld Rs. 1.37 crore in compensation to a woman entrepreneur whose hotel lease was wrongfully cancelled, stating that illegal termination of lease resulted in losses to the extent of Rs.1,37,57,009/.
Case-Title: WASEEM QURESHI vs STATE OF J&K AND ANOTHER
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 258
In granting relief to a former Medical Superintendent of SMHS Hospital, Srinagar, the Jammu & Kashmir High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner in an embezzlement case, holding that his conduct lacked mens rea and was already ratified by competent authorities.
Case Title: Sushant Khajuria Vs J&K Bank
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 259
Reiterating the legal position that a candidate does not acquire an indefeasible right to appointment merely by participating in the recruitment process, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a writ petition filed by Sushant Khajuria, an unsuccessful aspirant for the post of Probationary Officer (PO) in Jammu and Kashmir Bank.
Case-Title: ASIF AMIN CHALKOO & ORS vs UT of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 260
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court refused to quash an FIR registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act against certain public officials, despite acknowledging that the initial phase of investigation was conducted without the mandatory prior approval under Section 17A of the PC Act.
Case-Title: UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ORS. VS SALEEMA BEGUM & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 261
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court the writ court's finding of negligence on the part of the Power Development Department in the electrocution death of a 45-year-old man, holding that such hazardous activities attract presumed negligence, especially when no contrary material is brought on record by the department.
Case Title: Abdul Aziz Reshi Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 262
“Judicial restraint is especially warranted where the subject-matter requires specialized knowledge, such as the alignment of highways or public roads, which is fundamentally a matter of technical feasibility and infrastructural prudence,” observed Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh while dismissing a petition against the construction of a rural road.
Case-Title: U.T. OF J&K vs SHAKEEL AHMAD BHAT
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 263
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court upheld the government's decision to scrap the selection process for Class IV/MTS posts in a district, citing serious irregularities in the procedure.
Case Title: Naveed Bashir Wani Vs Varqa Bashir & Ors
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 264
In a pivotal ruling on the rights of women under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh held that a Domestic Incident Report (DIR) is not mandatory for a Magistrate to grant interim or ex parte relief under the statute.
Case-Title: Iqbal Singh vs Pankaj Sharma
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 265
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court came down heavily on a police officer for violating the directions laid down by the Supreme Court in the landmark judgement of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, 2014, on guidelines for arrest.
Case Title: Dr Noor Mohammad Bilal Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 266
Emphasising that the power of the constitutional courts cannot be exercised by transferring the investigation just for the asking nor is transfer directed only to satisfy the ego or vindicate prestige of a party interested for such investigation the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar dismissed a writ petition seeking a fresh investigation by the CBI into a house burglary case.
Case-Title: IQBAL MUBARIK vs UT of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 267
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that the Department of Home is liable to reimburse GST in addition to the fixed rent to hotel owners whose accommodations have been requisitioned for housing security forces.
Case Title: M/S PMT Industries Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 268
Reinforcing the rights of small industrial units, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar reiterated that the arbitrary withholding of payment for completed work is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. A bench of Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal thus directed the Union Territory administration and concerned departments to release the long-pending dues to a registered Small Scale Industrial (SSI) Unit, for execution of government-assigned works.
Case-Title: Met Life India Insurance Company Ltd vs Abdul Aziz Khan
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 269
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court set aside an order passed by the Consumer Commission, citing that it was “bereft of any reasons” and rendered without affording an opportunity to the insurance company to produce evidence in rebuttal against the claimant's statement.
Case-Title: Peerzada Muneer Ahmad vs Aaliya Anjum
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 270
The Jammu & Kashmir High court held that a Magistrate is empowered to drop proceedings or revoke interim orders issued under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) if, upon hearing the respondent and examining the record, it is found that no case is made out.
Case Title:Syed Jameel Qaiser & Ors Vs J&K State Cable Car Corp.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 271
Declaring that irregular appointments cannot be equated with illegal ones, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh ruled that qualified individuals appointed through a proper selection process and who have served in sanctioned posts for more than a decade are entitled to regularization of their services.
Case-Title: MOHAMMAD AKBAR SHEIKH vs MST JANA AND ORS
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 272
The Jammu & Kashmir High Court set aside an order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Kupwara, under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code, holding that the attachment of land and handing over of possession to third parties was done without adhering to the statutory procedure.
Case Title: Amir Medical Store Vs UT Of J&K
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 273
Reinforcing the legal principle that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh held that orders passed under Section 10 of the J&K Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1988, are appealable under Section 12 of the same Act.