- Home
- /
- High Courts
- /
- Madhya Pradesh High Court
- /
- Madhya Pradesh High Court Quarterly...
Madhya Pradesh High Court Quarterly Digest: July - September 2025
Jayanti Pahwa
19 Oct 2025 4:00 PM IST
Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 142 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 203Nominal Index X v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 142M/s Hindustan Equipment Pvt. Ltd. v. State of M.P. 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 143Ayyub Lala v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 144Ashok Airen v Family Welfare and Agriculture Department 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 145Ram Das Sahu v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 146Dileep Mehto v Union of India...
Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 142 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 203
Nominal Index
- X v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 142
- M/s Hindustan Equipment Pvt. Ltd. v. State of M.P. 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 143
- Ayyub Lala v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 144
- Ashok Airen v Family Welfare and Agriculture Department 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 145
- Ram Das Sahu v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 146
- Dileep Mehto v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 147
- Begum Suraiya Rashid v Begum Mehr Taj Nawab Sajida Sultan 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 148
- Hemant Malviya v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 149
- Bhopal Gas Peedith Sangharsh Samiti v High Court 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 150
- Rajesh Kumar v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 151
- Yadvendra Pandey v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 152
- Anupama Alice Minj Vs National Law Institute University 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 153
- Lal Bahadur Shastri Vyavasayik Adhyayan Mahavidyalaya v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 154
- Kumar Panchjanya v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 155
- National Testing Agency v Laxmi Devi 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 156
- Dhawal v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 157
- X v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 158
- Seetu v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 159
- Sumitabh v Ayukt, Nagar Palika Nigam 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 160
- Vishal v Central Film Certificate Board 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 161
- Prosecutrix X v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 162
- Riya Saraf v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 163
- Jagat Mohan Chaturvedi v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 164
- Rajneesh Chaturvedi v High Court of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 165
- Krishna Kumar Bhargava v State of M.P 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 166
- Varinder Kumar Naswa v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 167
- Smt. Mamta Pathak v The State Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 168
- Rajesh Raikwar v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 169
- Nain Singh Dhurve v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 170
- Capri Global Housing Finance Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 171
- Tanishq Patel v NHAI 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 172
- H v W 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 173
- Saurabh Nath Sharma v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 174
- A v B 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 175
- Laxmikant v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 176
- Jitendra Jani v Bhumi Jani 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 177
- N v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 178
- Aarav Singh v Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 179
- DK v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 180
- Darpan Awasthi v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 181
- Umang Singhar v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 182
- Pawan Pathak v Nathuram 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 183
- Shivang Bhargav v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 184
- HM v R 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 185
- Prosecutrix X v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 186
- Mahendra Jain v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 187
- Roop Singh Parihar v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 188
- PU v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 189
- Anil Patidar v Central Bureau of Investigation 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 190
- Subhas Sharma and Others v State of M.P. 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 191
- Sushil Verma v MP Industrial Infrastructure Development Corp 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 192
- Parameshwari Developers Pvt Ltd v Suresh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 193
- M/s Aaratrika Traders v the State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 194
- LSB v SK 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 195
- Ku Alka Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 196
- M/s Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Commercial Taxes Department 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 197
- Sangita v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 198
- Ashok Kumar Tripathi v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 199
- Jitendra Chawla v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 200
- Roop Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 201
- Anju Murti Upadhyay v State of MP 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 202
- Dr Himanshu Dutt Pandey v State 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 203
The Madhya Pradesh High Court modified a man's murder conviction–who was accused of assaulting his wife with a brick pursuant to which she died–to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, observing that he did not have the intention to kill the deceased.
Case Title: X v State of MP
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 142
The Madhya Pradesh High Court stated that taxpayers with pending appeals are eligible for 50% relief under the 2020 Samadhan Scheme (The Madhya Pradesh Karadhan Adhiniyamon Ki Puranee Bakaya Rashi Ka Samadhan Adhyadesh, 2020).
Case Title: M/s Hindustan Equipment Pvt. Ltd. v. State of M.P.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 143
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Wednesday (July 02) dismissed a public interest litigation seeking directions to the Government District Hospital in Khandwa to allow open access to the general public to visit Hazrat Syed Chand Shah Wali Mazad and a Shiv Temple, which are situated within the hospital premises.
Case Title: Ayyub Lala v State of MP
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 144
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, recently, dismissed a writ petition filed by an advocate under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking directions for the clearance of his professional bills pending since 2017.
Case Title: Ashok Airen v Family Welfare and Agriculture Department
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 145
A single judge bench of Justice Maninder Bhatti dismissed two writ petitions filed by daily wage workers (gardeners) challenging their termination. The workers argued that their employer had not followed the procedure mentioned under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, before terminating their services. However, the court held that providing retrenchment compensation and the termination order through registered post amounted to valid compliance with Section 25F, and actual acceptance of compensation is not required.
Case Title: Ram Das Sahu v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 146
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday (July 01) refused to entertain a PIL which among other issues claimed that Jabalpur Cantonment Board does not have a fire brigade and does not provide basic amenities to contractual sanitation workers which were stated to belong to a particular community.
Case Title: Dileep Mehto v Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 147
The Madhya Pradesh High Court remanded a dispute concerning the private properties of the erstwhile ruler of the then state of Bhopal the Late Nawab Mohd Hamidullah Khan, to the Trial Court for fresh decision after noting that the trial court–which ruled in favour of the respondents including the Nawab's daughter, grandson actor Saif Ali Khan, his mother and siblings–had relied on a judgment which had been subsequently overruled.
Case Title: Begum Suraiya Rashid v Begum Mehr Taj Nawab Sajida Sultan
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 148
The Madhya Pradesh High Court denied anticipatory bail to Cartoonist Hemant Malviya, accused of drawing a derogatory post including a "caricature" on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak (RSS) which is stated to be published on Malviya's Facebook page.
Case Title: Hemant Malviya v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 149
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday (July 08) refused to entertain a PIL filed by the Bhopal Gas Peedith Sangharsh Samiti to prevent the transfer, promotion or retirement of judges presiding over the long-pending cases related to the 1984 Bhopal Gas Tragedy, until the judgment is pronounced.
Case Title: Bhopal Gas Peedith Sangharsh Samiti v High Court
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 150
While hearing a PIL against an alleged illegal attempt to erect a statue on public land in Makdone, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has said that apart from the government and local bodies, no private individual, religious body, NGO or association is authorised to install statues at public places.
Case Title: Rajesh Kumar v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 151
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, recently, refused to quash an FIR filed against Yadvendra Pandey for allegedly posting a controversial video and ludicrous photos on Facebook, concerning PM Modi. The complaint also alleged Pandey used 'scurrilous language' against the Indian Armed Forces.
Case Title: Yadvendra Pandey v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 152
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has orally remarked that whilst India has not always been at the forefront of global education, the strict adherence to high standards in the 5 year law course, regulated by the Bar Council of India, has helped student's go abroad and perform well in foreign law firms and academic courses.
Case Title: Anupama Alice Minj Vs National Law Institute University
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 153
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Friday (July 11), dismissed a batch of public interest litigations challenging the amendment to admission eligibility criteria for the General Nursing and Midwifery Courses (G&M course) under the Madhya Pradesh Upcharika, Prasavika, Sahai Upcharika-Prasavika Tatha Swasthya Paridarkshak Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1972 Act.
Case Title: Lal Bahadur Shastri Vyavasayik Adhyayan Mahavidyalaya v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 154
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on July 9, disposed of a writ petition filed by an IIT Aspirant, who alleged that a technical glitch in his computer hampered his performance in paper 2 of JEE (Advanced) held on May 18, 2025.
Case Title: Kumar Panchjanya v Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 155
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday (July 14) allowed the writ appeals filed by the National Testing Agency against a Single Judge's direction to conduct re-test of the NEET-UG 2025 exam for candidates affected by power outage at the centres in Indore and Ujjain.
Case Title: National Testing Agency v Laxmi Devi
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 156
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday (July 14) dismissed an appeal by a former Revenue Inspector, challenging a single judge's order which had rejected the inspector's claim for retirement benefits sought under the State Government's Furlough Scheme, 2006.
Case Title: Dhawal v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 157
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday (July 15) imposed Rs 5 Lakh cost on the State for "inhumane and unsympathetic behaviour shown by the police officials" by delaying registration of workplace sexual harassment complaint by a woman who had accused the former Vice Chancellor of a national Yoga Institute of the offence.
Case Title: X v Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 158
While noting a "recurring pattern adopted by police officers" across Madhya Pradesh where even in serious injuries to complainants cases were stated to be lodged under "petty sections", the High Court directed that in "all cases of injuries" police officers and doctors shall take photographs of the injured parties.
Case Title: Seetu v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 159
The Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld an order setting aside a labour court's decision directing reinstatement of a group of daily wagers hired by a private outsourcing agency but deputed to work at Ujjain Municipal Corporation, ruling that direct payment of wages to the workmen by the local body doesn't amount to an employer-employee relationship.
Case Title: Sumitabh v Ayukt, Nagar Palika Nigam
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 160
MP High Court Disposes Plea Seeking Ban On 'Udaipur Files' In Terms Of Delhi HC Order
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday disposed of a plea seeking a ban on the release of the film 'Udaipur Files' by applying the directions passed on July 10 by the Delhi High Court in a similar matter.
Case Title: Vishal v Central Film Certificate Board
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 161
The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently directed police authorities to shift a pregnant girl– stated to be in a relationship with and residing with her partner booked under POCSO Act– after observing that the girl being a minor cannot reside with him.
Case Title: Prosecutrix X v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 162
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed the writ petition filed by a NEET UG 2025 candidate who sought relief for the non-declaration of her corrected result due to an alleged error in the OMR sheet.
Case Title: Riya Saraf v Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 163
Setting aside the dismissal of a Special Judge of the District Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court criticised the "dismal relationship" between Judges of the High Court and the Judges of the District Judiciary terming it one between a feudal lord and serf.
Case Title: Jagat Mohan Chaturvedi v State of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 164
The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a man's plea challenging an order passed by the high court on its administrative side on his complaint where he alleged that the trial court had assured him of an acquittal in an FIR, but instead he was convicted for the offence of voluntarily causing hurt.
Case Title: Rajneesh Chaturvedi v High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 165
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Monday (July 28), permitted the withdrawal of a public interest litigation that sought a policy intervention by the State Government to address the rising number of suicides among medical students, in view of the recent guidelines issued by the apex court on the issue.
Case Title: Krishna Kumar Bhargava v State of M.P
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 166
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed a PIL against use of acronyms M.P. or म.प्र. (in Hindi) to refer to the State, noting that the use of abbreviations does not change the name of the State. The bench remarked that use of such abbreviation rather makes identification easier.
Case Title: Varinder Kumar Naswa v Union of India
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 167
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday (July 29) upheld a Sessions Court order convicting an Assistant Professor of Chemistry for the murder of her husband and sentencing her to rigorous imprisonment for life.
Case Title: Smt. Mamta Pathak v The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 168
The Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed the suspension of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of District Central Cooperative Bank in Sidhi, observing that the action was not passed in the course of exercise of routine administrative functions but rather "passed in exercise of excessive powers and actuated by bias and at behest of MLA".
Case Title: Rajesh Raikwar v State of MP
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 169
Setting aside the conviction of two men in a 2021 murder case, the Madhya Pradesh High Court remarked that the police officials had implanted a false witness "in their zeal to complete the investigation without maintaining the integrity of investigation".
Case Title: Nain Singh Dhurve v State of MP
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 170
A division bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court, comprising Justice Anand Pathak and Justice Hirdesh, has allowed an appeal and upheld that a district magistrate can re-execute possession orders u/s 14 of the SARFAESI Act after illegal re-entry by the borrower. The Court directed the respondent authorities to provide necessary assistance to the petitioner to dispossess the borrower from the mortgaged property.
Case Name: Capri Global Housing Finance Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 171
The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently directed the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to monitor the construction and maintenance of the service road near Palda Bridge actively.
The direction was made in a public interest litigation filed by Advocates seeking directions to fix the road signs, remove the trucks parked on both sides of the Palda Bridge, remove speed breakers, as well as to constitute a committee for maintenance of the aforementioned road. The plea further sought directions against NHAI to take accountability for any accidents that might happen due to the poor maintenance of the National Highways.
Case Title: Tanishq Patel v NHAI (W.P. No. 23845 of 2023)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 172
Dismissing a husband's appeal for divorce on the ground of cruelty, the Madhya Pradesh High Court recently praised the wife's conduct as an 'ideal Indian woman' who, despite being deserted for nearly two decades, remained rooted in her dharma as a wife, continued living with her in-laws, and never gave up symbols of her marriage.
Case Title: H v W
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 173
Case Title: Saurabh Nath Sharma v State of Madhya Pradesh (WP 31146 of 2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 174
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday refused to entertain a PIL against a July 31 Facebook post published by a BJP leader announcing formation of a committee to organize a program 'Har Ghar Tiranga- Tiranga Yatra Avam Vibhajan Vibhishika Diwas' scheduled for August 15.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court said that husband challenging the maintenance granted to his wife by family court on the ground he is 'ready and willing to keep' her with him, does not constitute a valid offer.
Case Title: A v B (CRR-6279-2024)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 175
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, while granting anticipatory bail to a man accused of sending threatening messages to a woman, expressed concerns over the legislative framework that charges the act of sending 'such depraved or perverted messages on social media' under the offences which are bailable in nature.
Case Title: Laxmikant v State of Madhya Pradesh (MCRC-32524-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 176
The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently observed that a wife's occasional refusal to cohabit with her husband does not amount to cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, unless there is a persistent denial of conjugal relations.
Case title - JITENDRA JANI VS. SMT. BHUMI JANI
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 177
Law Does Not Prevent An Adult Woman From Living With A Married Man: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court said that there is no law which prevents an adult woman to live with married man adding that she has the right to choose with whom she wishes to live with.
The court noted that she had 'a mind of her own and the right to make a decision, whether right or wrong, with regard to the person with whom she wants to live', adding that the court cannot "pontificate on matters relating to morality".
Case Title: N v State of MP
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 178
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has reiterated that the fundamental right to education envisioned under Article 21 of the Constitution cannot be curtailed merely by imposing conditions regarding age limit.
It thus directed provisional admission of an 11-year-old student, who was denied admission to Class IX on the grounds of being underage as per the National Education Policy (NEP), 2020.
Case Title: Aarav Singh v Union of India (WP-13186-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 179
The Madhya Pradesh High Court overturned the conviction passed by the Trial Court under the POCSO Act, noting that the trial court had 'committed several irregularities'.
The court noted that the trial court failed to take 'cognizance of ossification test report available on record and, secondly, it did not pose questions under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. to the accused/applicant on the basis of the DNA test report'.
Case Title: DK v State of Madhya Pradesh (2025:MPHC-JBP:38420)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 180
MP High Court Rejects PIL Alleging Preferential Treatment To 'VIPs' At Mahakaleshwar Temple
The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a PIL alleging that the management committee of Ujjain's Shri Mahakaleshwar Temple permitted entry inside the Garbhagriha (innermost sanctum) only to "so-called VIPs" to offer water to the deity, while denying access to the general public.
Case Title: Darpan Awasthi v State of Madhya Pradesh (Writ Petition 32998/2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 181
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday (September 1), dismissed a plea by Congress MLA Umang Singhar against alleged inaction of the Assembly's Speaker on adjudicating Singhar's plea for disqualification of BJP MLA from Bina constituency Nirmla Sapre "on the ground of committing defection".
Case Title: Umang Singhar v State of Madhya Pradesh (WP-38050-2024)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 182
'Presiding Officer Has No Basic Knowledge Of Law': MP High Court Orders Training Of Civil Judge
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, recently, ordered the training of a 6th Civil Judge, Sr. Division, District Gwalior, noting that the 'Presiding Officer of Trial Court... has no basic knowledge of law and she needs training in JOTRI regarding procedural law'. These observations were made in a petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, wherein the petitioner's application under Order 22 Rule 3, read with Section 151 of CPC, was rejected.
Case Title: Pawan Pathak v Nathuram (MP-440-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 183
The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a man's plea challenging his detention, who was seen in a social media video uploaded by him, allegedly open firing his pistol in a residential area.
In doing so the court observed that the order passed by the District Magistrate Gwalior under National Security Act detaining him for three months, was justified as the man was threat to public order and the video created fear in the residents living in the area.
Case Title: Shivang Bhargav v State of Madhya Pradesh (WP NO. 12933/2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 184
The Madhya Pradesh High Court granted divorce to a man sought on the grounds of cruelty under Hindu Marriage Act(HMA), observing that his wife had "in a moment of despair" set herself ablaze and later blamed his relatives for the same without being able to provide any reliable evidence.
Case Title: HM v R (FA-133-2007)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 185
Noting that opinions of medical boards on termination of pregnancy did not contain complete information in several cases, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed that the board formed under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act must provide "complete, cogent and clear opinions" on MTP cases.
Case Title: Prosecutrix X v State of Madhya Pradesh (WP-34145-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 186
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday granted anticipatory bail to a former Congress councillor, Mahendra Jain, who has been accused of posting a derogatory comment against Union Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia from his Facebook account.
Case title - Mahendra Jain v State of MP (MCRC-40739-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 187
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has called for inquiry and disciplinary action against a Sessions Judge for dropping charges invoked against a government employee— computer operator working in the land acquisition office, accused of embezzling ₹5 crores of public money.
Case Title: Roop Singh Parihar v State of Madhya Pradesh (MCRC-27465-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 188
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ordered penal action against a woman, who falsely accused a Senior Advocate, having a standing of 20 years at the Bar, of committing rape upon her two year old daughter by breaking into their house at night.
Case Title: PU v State of Madhya Pradesh (2025:MPHC-JBP:44212)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 189
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has granted anticipatory bail to two cops booked for allegedly conspiring to shield a man by staging his fake encounter in 2009, after the man was found to be alive in 2012.
Case Title: Anil Patidar v Central Bureau of Investigation (M.CR.C. No.24925-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 190
The Madhya Pradesh High Court suspended the life sentence of man convicted in a murder case, after noting that that he had spent over 10 years in custody and two of his co-accused having spent similar time in custody had already been enlarged on bail.
The court further directed the appellant to plant and nurture 10 fruit bearing/neem or peepal saplings.
Case Title: Subhas Sharma and Others v State of M.P. (Cr.A. No.6089/2021)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 191
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Friday (September 19), advocated for evolution and effective implementation of the concept of social audit calling it the need of the hour.
The court was hearing an appeal challenging dismissal of a writ petition, where the appellant had sought promotion, due to non-appearance of his advocate.
Case Title: Sushil Verma v Madhya Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (WA-2566-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 192
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has strongly criticized the Trial Court for passing a non-speaking order while dismissing multiple applications by a party including those for substitution of parties (under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC) on the ground of absence of the party and its counsel.
In doing so the high court observed that the trial court had "prima facie committed an illegality" by passing a non-speaking order demonstrating a classic instance of abdication of judicial duty.
Case Title: Parameshwari Developers Pvt Ltd v Suresh and Others (MP-5129-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 193
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed the concerned police officials to conduct a preliminary inquiry in a writ petition alleging arbitrary and oppressive conduct by Bajaj Finance Limited, which was accused of using coercion, threats and abusive language to recover a business loan of ₹ 25.69 lakhs.
Case Title: M/s Aaratrika Traders v the State of Madhya Pradesh (WP-37028-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 194
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday (September 22) dismissed a man's plea challenging a family court's maintenance order in favour of his wife and kids, noting that the husband was trying to shirk away from his liability while enjoying his life with expensive bikes.
Case Title: LSB v SK (2025:MPHC-IND:27741)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 195
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday (September 22), disposed of a PIL for installing view cutters on a newly inaugurated 7-km flyover connecting Madan Mahal to Damoh Naka in Jabalpur to safeguard the privacy of the adjoining residents, while asking the State to consider taking steps so that no accidents take place.
Case Title: Ku Alka Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh [WP - 37365/2025]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 196
The Madhya Pradesh High Court stated that White Petroleum Jelly is classified as a 'Drug', not 'Cosmetic', and therefore is not liable to higher VAT and Entry Tax.
Justices Vivek Rusia and Jai Kumar Pillai stated that a White Petroleum Jelly of IP grade manufactured and sold by appellant under a valid drug licence is liable to be classified as a category of drug and medicine under Entry 19-A of Part II, Schedule II of the MP VAT Act.
Case Title: M/s Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Commercial Taxes Department [Value Added Tax Appeal No. 73 of 2019]
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 197
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on Friday (September 26), directed the State Authorities to ensure that any person or any organization does not burn an effigy of Sonam Raghuwanshi, accused of murdering her husband during their honeymoon in Meghalaya, on Dusshera/Vijaydashmi in place of Ravana.
Case Title: Sangita v State of Madhya Pradesh (WP-38824-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 198
In a police personnel's plea against compulsory retirement given for sleeping under influence while on guard duty, the Madhya Pradesh High Court flagged growing mobile/social media 'intoxication' among the 'uniform clad departments' suggesting that presence of police personnel on social media be checked while they are on duty.
Case Title: Ashok Kumar Tripathi v State of MP (WRIT APPEAL 1140 of 2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 199
The Madhya Pradesh High Court granted anticipatory bail to 3 persons and regular bail to one, accused of abetting suicide of a borrower despite the latter's video suicide note alleging that they had threatened the deceased to pay more towards interest despite payment of principal amount.
Case Title: Jitendra Chawla v State of MP (MCRC-39590-2025)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 200
The Madhya Pradesh High Court set aside punishment imposed on a head constable whose one increment was withheld indefinitely for alleged unauthorized leave for 99 days due to his own and his father's illness which it said was not considered by the authorities.
The court also reiterated that remaining absent from duty may not a misconduct in itself unless it is intentional.
Case Title: Roop Singh v State of Madhya Pradesh (W.P.No. 4426/2021)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 201
The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed release of compensation under Mukhyamantri Covid-19 Yoddha Kalyan Yojana to the widow of government department official, ruling that the only requirement under the scheme was that the death must occur while serving during Covid-19 pandemic which was fulfilled in this case.
Case Title: Anju Murti Upadhyay v State of MP (WP-18400-2020)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 202
The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed an appeal of a BAMS doctor challenging the State Government's refusal to grant sanction to prosecute the inspection team that searched his clinic in Ujjain, observing that the complaint was nothing but an effort to harass the inspection team who were discharging their duties.
Case Title: Dr Himanshu Dutt Pandey v State of Madhya Pradesh (2025:MPHC-IND:23399)
Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 203