Single Whatsapp Message Raising General Dispute Can't Become Foundation To Reject Petition U/S 9 Of IBC: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Mr. Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) and Mr. Indevar Pandey (Technical Member) has held that a single WhatsApp message sent long ago cannot serve as the foundation to dispute an entire series of transactions, especially when no specific invoices—forming the foundation...

Viability Of Corporate Debtor Can't Be Considered While Deciding Petition U/S 7 Of IBC Once Debt & Default Are Established: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member) and Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) has held that an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be rejected solely on the ground that the corporate debtor is a viable entity and that initiating insolvency proceedings would adversely...

IBC Monthly Digest: May 2025

Nominal Index: Riju Ravindran Versus Pankaj Srivastava, C.A. No. 6613 of 2025 TATA STEEL LTD Versus Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 542 Kalyani Transco Versus M/s Bhushan Steel and Power Ltd and connected appeals, C.A. No. 1808 of 2020 VISA COKE LIMITED Versus M/s MESCO KALINGA STEEL LIMITED, 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 505 NCLT Advocates Bar Association &...

Limitation Period For Filing Application U/S 95 Of IBC Against Personal Guarantor Stands Extended By Acknowledgement Of Debt: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench comprising Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Mr. Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) and Mr. Indevar Pandey (Technical Member) has held that the limitation period for filing an application under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“the Code”) by a creditor against a personal guarantor,...

Registration Of Security Interest With CERSAI Is Sufficient To Claim Status Of Secured Financial Creditor: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan and Mr. Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) has held that security interest can be proved through its registration with Central Registry of Securitisation Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India (CERSAI) and the financial creditor...

Litigants Are Not Trained Advocates, Restoration Application Can't Be Dismissed Due To Counsel's Failure To Inform Of Proceedings: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member), Mr. Naresh Salecha (Technical Member) and Mr. Indevar Pandey (Technical Member) has held that the restoration application under Rule 48(2) of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Rules, 2016 cannot be dismissed if the application is filed within 30 days from the date...

Mere Execution Of Restructuring Agreement Does Not Extinguish Corporate Debtor's Liability When Restructuring Scheme Is Not Approved By NCLT: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that the mere signing of a Master Restructuring Agreement, wherein a third party undertakes to discharge the liabilities of the Corporate Debtor, does not result in the extinguishment of the Corporate Debtor's obligations...

Continued Reflection Of Debt In Balance Sheet Amounts To Acknowledgement U/S 18 Of Limitation Act: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that a default in repayment obligations is said to occur when the debt is continuously reflected in the Corporate Debtor's balance sheets over an extended period, particularly when...

Liquidation Of Corporate Debtor Can Be Ordered If Successful Resolution Applicant Cannot Obtain Necessary Approvals Within One Year: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that when a successful resolution applicant fails to obtain all necessary approvals within one year from the date of approval of the resolution plan— as mandated under Section 31(4)...

Resolution Plan Providing Contingencies To Ensure Compliance With Building Norms Can't Be Deemed Unviable: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) has held that one of the contingencies outlined in the resolution plan has been accepted, and Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) has expressed readiness to execute the construction in accordance with...

Court Records Can't Be Disputed Without Filing Correction Application: NCLAT Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain (Judicial Member) & Barun Mitra (Technical Member), dismissed an appeal challenging the National Company Law Tribunal's refusal to accept a reply filed after the closure of arguments. The Tribunal held that the record of the Court is correct until and unless an application is made to the...

NCLT Lacks Authority To Restrain Replacement Of Liquidator In Voluntary Liquidation: NCLAT Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Judicial Member), Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) held that the National Company Law Tribunal can't compel the corporate debtor to retain the same liquidator once a valid board resolution has been passed for their replacement under...