Supreme Court Rejects JSW's Resolution Plan For Bhushan Steel As Illegal, Orders Liquidation; Says CoC Acted Without Commercial Wisdom

The Court also slammed the conduct of the Resolution Professional.

Existence Of Proceedings Under MSMED Act Or S.138 NI Act Doesn't Amount To Pre-Existing Dispute U/S 9 Of IBC: NCLT Mumbai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, comprising Shri Prabhat Kumar (Member- Technical) and Justice V. G. Bisht, has allowed an application filed by an operational creditor under section 9 of the IBC seeking initiation of the CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority observed that the proceedings under the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises...

Loan Taken From "Special Window For Affordable & Mid-Income Housing Fund" To Be Recognised As 'Interim Finance' U/S 5(15) Of IBC: NCLT, Delhi

The National Company Law Tribunal (“Tribunal”), New Delhi bench of Shri Manni Sankariah Shanmuga Sundaram (Judicial Member) and Dr. Sanjeev Ranjan (Technical Member), allowed the claim of the applicant as Interim Finance holding that Loan provided by SWAMIH Fund (Special Window for Affordable and Mid-Income Housing) qualifies to be recognised as 'Interim Finance' under Section 5(15)...

Guarantor's Liability Cannot Exceed Contractual Cap By Adding Interest On Principal Amount For Delayed Payment: NCLT Mumbai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Mumbai bench of Justice Sh. Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey (Judicial Member) and Sh. Charanjeet Singh Gulati (Technical Member) has held that the guarantor's liability cannot exceed the limit specified in the contract of guarantee. When the corporate debtor defaults, the guarantor is bound only to the extent of the capped amount that is Rs. 25 crore...

When There Is Sufficient Material To Show Dispute U/S 9(5)(ii)(d) Of IBC, Adjudicating Authority Cannot Ignore The Same: NCLAT, New Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (NCLAT) comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Member Technical) admitted appeal filed Suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor challenging the order dated 26.03.2025 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench, Court-I, admitting Section 9...

S. 8 IBC | Service Of Demand Notice On Corporate Debtor's Key Managerial Personnel Is Valid To Trigger Insolvency Process : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 29) upheld the delivery of a demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) to the corporate debtor's Key Managerial Personnel (KMP), stating that the delivery of the notice to the KMP substantially complies with the requirement of Section 8 of IBC. Setting aside the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal...

Repeated Filing Of Applications U/S 42 Of IBC Violates Principle Of Res Judicata, Amounts To Abuse Of Law: NCLAT Chennai

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai, comprising Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma (Member (Judicial) and Jatindranath Swain (Member (Technical) dismissed appeals filed by the EPFO against the RP and SRA, stating that the same is restricted by the Doctrine of Res Judicata. Background The Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) filed a Company Appeal before...

Claims For Interest Based On RERA Order Do Not Translate Into Financial Debt Under IBC: NCLT Delhi

The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLT) comprising of Shri Manni Sankariah Shanmuga Sundaram, Member (Judicial) and Dr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Member (Technical) dismissed a Section 60(5) application filed by the Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta against Mr. Devendra Umrao, the Resolution professional (RP) of M/s Opulent Infradevelopers Pvt Ltd. Background An application was filed...

IBC Weekly Round Up [21st April-28th April 2025]

Nominal Index: Electrosteel Steel Limited (Now M/S ESL Steel Limited) vs Ispat Carrier Private Limited, 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 491 Anup Kumar Singh Vs Union of India & others., WPA 4585 of 2023 Arrhum Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. v. Manoj Khattar (Liquidator), Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1944 of 2024 Maneesh Ramakant Sapte Vs Export Import Bank of India & Ors,...

Arbitral Award For Claims Not Included In IBC Resolution Plan Can't Be Enforced: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court recently allowed an appeal challenging the enforcement of an arbitral award passed by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC) against Electrosteel Steels Ltd., holding that the award was non-executable in view of the resolution plan approved under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.“we have no hesitation to hold that upon...

Adjudicating Authority Cannot Declare Sale Of Going Concern As Void Without Any Challenge: NCLAT New Delhi

The Principal Bench of NCLAT, New Delhi, consisting of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Arun Baroka (Member-Technical), set aside the NCLT, Ahmedabad Bench's order and held that a sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern cannot be declared null and void suo moto by the Adjudicating Authority in the absence of any challenge to such sale. The Adjudicating Authority had...

Financial Creditors Proceeding With Application U/S 7 Only As A Recovery Measure Is Not The Objective Of IBC: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (NCLAT) comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Barun Mitra (Member Technical) dismissed and appeal filed by a suspended director of the Corporate Debtor (Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited) challenging the order of admitting Section 7 application by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT),...