Delhi Court Judge Writes Poetry 'Jang-e-Milkiyat', Grants Bail To Accused In Property Dispute Case

Nupur Thapliyal

20 July 2025 10:05 AM IST

  • Lawyer misbehaved, criminal proceedings dropped, Harmony Between Bar & Bench, Additional Sessions Judge Shivaji Anand, Delhi Court, rohini courts,
    Listen to this Article

    While granting bail to a man accused in a property dispute case, a Delhi Court judge yesterday wrote his own poetry in the order titled “Jang-Milkiyat.”

    Judicial Magistrate First Class Rohit Kumar of Rohini Courts granted bail to one Nitin Soni in a case alleging that he and his wife had taken illegal possession of a property of the complainant after breaking the lock and attacking her with a rod.

    The bail order began with the judge writing his own poetry which reads as:

    “Milkiyat ki Jang mein na jaane kitne afsaane hue, Kuch hi apne the, Vo bhi ab begaane hue.

    Banke Krishna, Ab kisi ko aana hoga, Sadte, ladte, bigadte rishhton ko bachaana hoga.

    Na jaane ye Jang aur Kitni Mahabharat laayegi, Aakhir kitno ko salaakhon tak le jaayegi.

    Bankar beti, rishto ko bachaana hoga, Sabhi naato ko nibhana hoga.

    Kya rakkha hai is Jang mein koi bataayega, Aakhir is Dharti se kaun kya hi le jaayega.”

    Soni was arrested on July 12. As per the reply of the Delhi Police, a court had given the direction qua possession of the property in favour of the complainant.

    It was stated that there were many PCR calls, complaints, NCR against the accused and that Soni had also being prosecuted for preventive action.

    Soni's counsel submitted that it was not a case of illegal possession because his mother herself had given the possession to him on the oral agreement.

    It was contended that there were photographs of Soni and his family which were clearly reflecting that they were already in possession of the property before July 10.

    His counsel said that if there was illegal possession and trespassing at the end of Soni, why contempt and eviction proceeding were not initiated against him.

    The prosecution argued that Soni had taken the illegal possession of the property of the complainant after the preparation and even if the complainant had been dispossessed from the property, still she was in the constructive possession.

    On a specific query of the court, the IO submitted that till now, no CCTV footage or video was recovered which could reflect that Soni had broken the lock of the property and entered into the property on July 10 or before.

    “After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, court is inclined to grant the bail to the accused Nitin Soni…,” the judge said.

    Next Story