Live Law
Existing User Account
Gift Premium
Subscribe Premium
  • Law Firms
  • LiveLaw Hindi
  • Top Stories
  • Law Schools Corner
    • Law School Articles
    • Scholarships/Fellowships
    • School Admission
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
    • All High Courts
    • Allahabad High Court
    • Andhra Pradesh High Court
    • Bombay High Court
    • Calcutta High Court
    • Chhattisgarh High Court
    • Delhi High Court
    • Gauhati High Court
    • Gujarat High Court
    • Himachal Pradesh High Court
    • High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
    • Jharkhand High Court
    • Karnataka High Court
    • Kerala High Court
    • Madhya Pradesh High Court
    • Madras High Court
    • Manipur High Court
    • Meghalaya High Court
    • Orissa High Court
    • Patna High Court
    • Punjab and Haryana High Court
    • Rajasthan High Court
    • Sikkim High Court
    • Telangana High Court
    • Tripura High Court
    • Uttarakhand High Court
  • News Updates
  • Articles
  • Law Schools
    • Call For Papers
    • Competitions
    • Diploma/Certificate Courses
    • Internships
    • Law School Articles
    • Scholarships Fellowships
    • LLM/PHD
    • Moot Courts
    • Placements
    • Law Exams
    • law School Admission
    • Seminars
  • Law Firms
    • Deal News
    • Events
    • Foreign Law Firms
    • Internships
    • Law Firm Articles
  • Videos
  • Know The Law
  • Digests
  • More
    Consumer CasesBook ReviewsRounds UpsEventsInternationalJob UpdatesTax
    EnvironmentPodcastIBCArbitrationSponsoredLabour & ServiceTech & Law
  • Home
  • /
  • Rajesh Panayanthatta
Rajesh Panayanthatta

Rajesh Panayanthatta

Demand Notice Issued By Lawyer On Behalf Of Operational Creditor Can’t Be Treated As Demand Notice Required Under Sec.8(1) Of I & B Code: NCLAT

Demand Notice Issued By Lawyer On Behalf Of Operational Creditor Can’t Be Treated As Demand Notice Required Under Sec.8(1) Of I & B Code: NCLAT

11 Oct 2017 3:13 PM IST

Pendency Of Execution Petitions Or Appeals Under Sec.37 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Not A Bar To Initiate Insolvency Resolution Process; NCLAT [Read Judgment]

Pendency Of Execution Petitions Or Appeals Under Sec.37 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Not A Bar To Initiate Insolvency Resolution Process; NCLAT [Read Judgment]

31 Aug 2017 7:32 PM IST

Can Flat Buyers Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Builders Under The Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code?

Can Flat Buyers Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Builders Under The Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code?

16 Aug 2017 2:50 PM IST

Issuance Of Certificate By Banks U/S Sec.9 Of I&B Code, 2016, An Extra Impossible Task Thrust Upon Banks

Issuance Of Certificate By Banks U/S Sec.9 Of I&B Code, 2016, An Extra Impossible Task Thrust Upon Banks

5 Aug 2017 9:39 PM IST

X
We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok
x
IP subscription is detected for  
Please register yourself for unlimited free access.
Redirecting to register page...