Former Judges, Senior Lawyers write to CJI demanding suo motu action against Hate Speech
5 March 2016 2:51 PM IST
![“Criminalization of Defamation acts as a Handcuff on the Freedom of Speech and expression”; Aravind Datar [Read the Written Submission]](https://www-livelaw-in.demo.remotlog.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Aravind-Dattar.jpg "“Criminalization of Defamation acts as a Handcuff on the Freedom of Speech and expression”; Aravind Datar [Read the Written Submission]")
![Intermediaries are liable for posting of unsolicited comments: Grand Chamber, ECHR [Read Jt]](https://www-livelaw-in.demo.remotlog.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Grand-Chamber-ECHR.jpg "Intermediaries are liable for posting of unsolicited comments: Grand Chamber, ECHR [Read Jt]")
Intermediaries are liable for posting of unsolicited comments: Grand Chamber, ECHR [Read Jt]
17 Jun 2015 9:46 AM IST
![US Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech Online ;‘Intent Test’ to be preferred over ‘Prudency Test’ in judging the permissible limits [Read the Judgment]](https://www-livelaw-in.demo.remotlog.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/us-supreme-court.jpg "US Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech Online ;‘Intent Test’ to be preferred over ‘Prudency Test’ in judging the permissible limits [Read the Judgment]")
"Free speech, Obscenity and 'Respected Historical Personalities': A Troubling New Doctrine
14 May 2015 8:22 PM IST
![Using obscene language against historically respected personalities cannot be allowed in the name of artistic freedom, critical thinking or creativity; SC [Read the Judgment]](https://www-livelaw-in.demo.remotlog.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Mahathma-Gandhi.jpg "Using obscene language against historically respected personalities cannot be allowed in the name of artistic freedom, critical thinking or creativity; SC [Read the Judgment]")
