Presidential Reference On Timelines For Bills' Assent : Live Updates From Supreme Court

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

19 Aug 2025 10:35 AM IST

  • Presidential Reference On Timelines For Bills Assent : Live Updates From Supreme Court

    A 5-judge Constitution Bench of the SupremeCourt will hear today the Presidential Reference by President Droupadi Murmu on 14 questions on the power to assent on Bills, including whether Court can fix timelines for the President/Governor to decide on Bills.The Presidential Reference, made under Article 143, came a month after Supreme Court's judgment in Tamil Nadu Governor's matter, wherein...

    A 5-judge Constitution Bench of the SupremeCourt will hear today the Presidential Reference by President Droupadi Murmu on 14 questions on the power to assent on Bills, including whether Court can fix timelines for the President/Governor to decide on Bills.

    The Presidential Reference, made under Article 143, came a month after Supreme Court's judgment in Tamil Nadu Governor's matter, wherein the Court held that the Governor did not act bona fide in reserving Bills to President. It held those bills as deemed assented. In the judgment passed by Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, the Court held that the President must act on the Bills reserved for her under Article 201 within 3 months:

    The reference will be heard by a bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice PS Narasimha and Justice AS Chandurkar.




     


    Follow this page for live updates.

    Live Updates

    • 19 Aug 2025 2:23 PM IST

      AG: Now, when have an opposite conclusion in the recent judgment.

    • 19 Aug 2025 2:23 PM IST

      AG: why timeline was not prescribed for Governor and President.




       


    • 19 Aug 2025 2:23 PM IST

      AG: Purushothaman Nambudiri judgment referred-




       


    • 19 Aug 2025 2:17 PM IST

      AG: conclusion draw is Governor is aid and advise of Council- if the four option is endorsed by two reports, am I expected to be toppled by aid and advise of ministers? Virtually subverts my options under four-option theory.

    • 19 Aug 2025 2:14 PM IST

      AG: It is submitted, the four option theory is the correct theory, on question one. The Sarkaria Commission report endorses this.

    • 19 Aug 2025 2:12 PM IST

      AG: In Pavitra, the Court has held that confernment of powers for reservation can't be confined as exigency can arise.

    • 19 Aug 2025 2:10 PM IST

      AG says Article 200 can't be read to bind the Governor on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.

    • 19 Aug 2025 2:10 PM IST

      AG: [referring to TN judgment] on broad questions, tracing history from Government of India Act, 1935, the court completes to conclusion the word 'discretion' is dropped from the Act and he must act in aid and advise. The word although does not find mention, it will have implications.

    • 19 Aug 2025 2:10 PM IST

      CJI: What is the final conclusion in the judgment?

      AG: I will read that; I wish to confine to 3-4 issues which talks about how Article 200 has undergone change [refers to the issues]

    • 19 Aug 2025 2:05 PM IST

      AG: We have relevant paragraphs of the Tamil Nadu judgment

      CJI: where according to you the Constitution is amended

    Next Story