Supreme Court Hearing-Presidential Reference On Timelines For Bills' Assent-DAY-3 : Live Updates

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

21 Aug 2025 10:26 AM IST

  • Supreme Court Hearing-Presidential Reference On Timelines For Bills Assent-DAY-3 : Live Updates

    A 5-judge Constitution Bench of the SupremeCourt will hear today the Presidential Reference by President Droupadi Murmu on 14 questions on the power to assent on Bills, including whether Court can fix timelines for the President/Governor to decide on Bills. The Presidential Reference, made under Article 143, came a month after Supreme Court's judgment in Tamil Nadu Governor's matter, wherein...

    A 5-judge Constitution Bench of the SupremeCourt will hear today the Presidential Reference by President Droupadi Murmu on 14 questions on the power to assent on Bills, including whether Court can fix timelines for the President/Governor to decide on Bills.

    The Presidential Reference, made under Article 143, came a month after Supreme Court's judgment in Tamil Nadu Governor's matter, wherein the Court held that the Governor did not act bona fide in reserving Bills to President. It held those bills as deemed assented. In the judgment passed by Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, the Court held that the President must act on the Bills reserved for her under Article 201 within 3 months:

    The reference will be heard by a bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice PS Narasimha and Justice AS Chandurkar.

    Yesterday proceedings can be followed here 

    Follow this page for live updates from today's hearing. 

    Live Updates

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:50 PM IST

      SG: why classical concept of judicial review will not apply? Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar referred.

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:48 PM IST

      SG: While exercising justiciability, the submission is divided

      1. nature of power

      2. non-justiciablity as facet of the independence of three organs- certain functions are core functions

      3. judicial restraint

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:46 PM IST

      SG: We have constitutional supremacy, but don't have Parliamentary or legislative supremacy.

      CJI: Sovereign is the Constitution.

      SG: Supreme is the Constitution.

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:44 PM IST

      SG: another important question- whether exercise of power of President under Article 111 or Governor under 200 and President under 201 justiciable? In my view, it is not justiciable. One than one judgment supports it. Power of assent is a legislative act and otherwise as coordinate constitutional organ, the power is not justiciable.

      When we say, kindly take this as constitutional argument, in Britain the Courts can't go questions because of Parliamentary supremacy except for human rights. Fortunately, the Supreme Court of India is the most powerful as mylords can set aside constitutional amendment, legislations.

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:39 PM IST

      SG: directions is to the timeline, give reasons and States can approach the Court

      CJI: that will in violation of time line

      SG: to get mandamus issued.

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:36 PM IST

      SG: as soon as possible- I am giving a judgment, Abdul Munim.

      Can manner of exercise of powers be prescribed?

      J Narasimha: show us the portion of two judge bench where it has been

      CJI: that may be valid when some members of executive exercises adminstrative powers

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:31 PM IST

      Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: five years, I have been saying Speaker is a tribunal

      CJI: we said we don't want to create a situation of operation successful, patient dead.

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:30 PM IST

      CJI: this court held that MLAs writting a letter from BSP that from SP Mulayam Singh should be made the CM itself was enough for disqualification.

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:30 PM IST

      SG: Kesham judgment

      CJI: All have held that the speaker is a tribunal and he is amenable to the jurisdiction of this Court. Right from Kihoton, it has been held that he does not enjoy immunity. Kesham judgment also does not lay down guidelines. An argument was made that in UP case that the court should exercise the power and itself qualification, the Mayawati judgment.

    • 21 Aug 2025 12:28 PM IST

      SG:




       


    Next Story